| « Previous | 19921 to 19930 of 63161 | Next » |
Anonymous
dont see 20% 1st subscribe
2 years ago |
cheetah
Might be targeted. //@anonymous: dont see 20% 1st subscribe
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I have this for almost 2 years now. It's good to have but it makes mistakes so you can't solely rely on it.
Also there are very few apps that are compatible with it if you plan to use your phone.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
in for 2
2 years ago |
| « Previous | 19921 to 19930 of 63161 | Next » |
Anonymous
There is also one with attachments for $8 more. Also a good deal.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
not wireless
2 years ago |
Anonymous
True. The cord is a tradeoff. In my experience cordless ones either eat batteries so fast that they end up not being cheap, or they're rechargeable ones are just far more expensive. Plus it seems like the rechargeable cordless ones don't get very good reviews while this one does. This might be a good option for some people. //@Anonymous: not wireless
2 years ago |