Anonymous
Intel i9 supports 128G
5 months ago |
Anonymous
M5 - max up to 32GB
might want look into M4 Pro or M4 Max for now //@Anonymous: I need at least 48gb
7 months ago |
Anonymous
I need at least 48gb
7 months ago |
Anonymous
I also use my iphone to find my iwatach //@anonymous: I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.
3 months ago |
Anonymous
I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.
4 months ago |
Anonymous
I believe for the same price, you can get the Cellular on at Walmart now.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
they mean 2nd gen //@Anonymous: there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024
6 months ago |
Anonymous
there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024
6 months ago |
Anonymous
https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/?modelList=watch-se-gen1,watch-se-gen2
Yes, 2022.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Not 2022??
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Just get 42mm then and save some $. It's just smaller but all the functionalities are the same. And it'll look great on your wrist. //@Anonymous: 46mm $329. Read please //@anonymous: It’s $329, not $299.
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Why apple can’t cure the cancer!
//@Anonymous: Why apple can’t add glucose monitoring even after charging hefty price
11 months ago |
Anonymous
46mm $329. Read please //@anonymous: It’s $329, not $299.
11 months ago |
Anonymous
It’s $329, not $299.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Don't pay Apple Tax, buy something else.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
we have no technology that can find sugar without blood. Libre Or Dexcomm needs a sensor pin inside body for 10-14 days.I will not trust any product that can measure sugar touching skin. not possible for longtime.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Who can? //@anonymous: Why apple can’t add glucose monitoring even after charging hefty price
1 year ago |
Anonymous
If they can monitor glucose from Apple Watch, their stock price will easily double/triple! //@Anonymous: Why apple can’t add glucose monitoring even after charging hefty price
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Why apple can’t add glucose monitoring even after charging hefty price
1 year ago |
Anonymous
For laptop, 4060 is a sweet spot. Less than 10% slower than 4070 and 30% faster than 4050. 4070 is a real trash IMO //@anonymous: RTX4060 sucks
2 years ago |
Anonymous
For laptop 4060 is the best compared with 4050 and 4070. It sucks when you compare it with 4080 and 4090 //@Anonymous: RTX4060 sucks
2 years ago |
Anonymous
why? //@Anonymous: RTX4060 sucks
2 years ago |
Anonymous
RTX4060 sucks
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It was $1316 yesterday
3 years ago |
Anonymous
great deal
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I bought the 3850 version from costco. Printing office document was fine, but whenever I used it to print flyers or any doc with images, they are so grainy! Not presentable. Messed around with the settings, nothing was able to solve the problem. I am returning it.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Just set it up yesterday, initial setup costs 25% of black ink, 15% other colors lol
3 years ago |
Anonymous
It is less than $200 //@anonymous: Should be less than $200 to be a decent buy.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
229.99 is MSRP everywhere //@Anonymous: Should be less than $200 to be a decent buy.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Should be less than $200 to be a decent buy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Link please or SKU //@anonymous: Adding 70 dollars for the Lenovo model with 8 core and 8GB for an usable laptop.
3 months ago |
Anonymous
Adding 70 dollars for the Lenovo model with 8 core and 8GB for an usable laptop.
4 months ago |
Anonymous
N4500 dual core and 4GB of RAM, running resource hungry Windows 11. Well made electronic junk out of the box.
4 months ago |
Anonymous
15-inch Sky Blue with M5 chip 24GB Memory 512GB SSD - Apple Edu - $1399+Tax. //@junjee: Where can we get the M5 for this price? Same spec? //@Anonymous: No deal, you can M5 for same price
1 month ago |
junjee
Where can we get the M5 for this price? Same spec? //@Anonymous: No deal, you can M5 for same price
1 month ago |
Anonymous
No deal, you can M5 for same price
2 months ago |
Anonymous
It's a 1920x1200 screen. Typically a "2K" screen refers to 2560x1440, or something similar. This is some scummy advertising from WorstBuy
6 months ago |
Anonymous
It's a 1920x1200 screen. Typically a "2K" screen refers to 2560x1440, or something similar. This is some scummy advertising from WorstBuy
6 months ago |
Anonymous
i have a laptop from this series, txt, browsing etc looks way better in 2k than 1080P, in games theres not much difference. Build quality is good, but it can be difficult to put the bottom cover back on correctly after adding extra nvme/ram. keyboard is disappointing, i tend to hit wrong keys more often, than on my lenovo laptop, its both feel, and key placement, maybe i just dont have enough time with it
4 months ago |
Anonymous
FYI, the 2K is not something notably improved from 1080P.
4 months ago |
limarcus
NO, I'm sorry to say, UPS shipping label is 4*6" and this model doesn't support that size //@anonymous: can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
4 years ago |
limarcus
all label printers use thermal transfer technology, no ink/toner consumption at all, the thermal transfer has the advantage of low consumable cost and fast printing, but the downside is considerably low printing resolution. And the thermal mechanism dominated most of its cost. This dual printer model should be used in a fast pace environment like takeout counter to double printer efficiency and at this price point, this one is unbeatable //@Anonymous: Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
OfficeMax has se2722h for 89.99.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Apple 2026 new product : I-diot
2 months ago |
Anonymous
Well the screen and battery life are better than most PC laptop //@anonymous: 8GB/256GB in 2026. What a time to be alive!
2 months ago |
Anonymous
8GB/256GB in 2026. What a time to be alive!
2 months ago |
Anonymous
Yep, they cancelled my order. No HP for me. There are so many other laptop options.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
Yes, it was, but all orders were cancelled; welcome to HP! //@Anonymous: It was $120 last week
8 months ago |
Anonymous
It was $120 last week
8 months ago |
Anonymous
Get the M4 version using education discount
1 year ago |
Anonymous
13” //@Anonymous: 256GB at $1049 in Nov/Dec was a better deal.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
256GB at $1049 in Nov/Dec was a better deal.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
13” //@anonymous: Overpriced, I got 1099 at Best Buy
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Overpriced, I got 1099 at Best Buy
1 year ago |
Anonymous
14.2 M3 pro 18G 512 G at $1,499 is a better option
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Clip the $49.01 off coupon offered by Amazon. //@anonymous: It’s $1599 in Amazon not $1549
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It’s $1599 in Amazon not $1549
2 years ago |
Anonymous
storage will be filled up in seconds
1 year ago |
Anonymous
bought mine like 10 years ago about the same price //@Anonymous: good deal?
5 months ago |
Anonymous
was it the Woot refurb one? //@Anonymous: not good, I got a color all-in-one, much newer model at $179 //@Anonymous: good deal?
6 months ago |
Anonymous
not good, I got a color all-in-one, much newer model at $179 //@Anonymous: good deal?
6 months ago |
Anonymous
canons are no good
9 months ago |
Anonymous
good deal?
9 months ago |
Anonymous
$519 now
1 week ago |
Anonymous
Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Nope. Some old Ipad were impossible to upgrade even you have Icloud //@Anonymous: money for ipad / iphone storage can be better spent for icloud.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
be aware. apple will no longer support this version very soon.
6 months ago |
Anonymous
all oos
9 months ago |
Anonymous
Nope, wrong price.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
This is the Ipad 9th generation model (2021). The current model is 10th generation (released in Nov 2022)
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Must add Target link as it's the best deal with immediate 5% off using RedCard!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Targrt has the same price. Plus 5% off if you have the red card //@Anonymous: Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
2 years ago |
mutongo
64GB is 269 and it is available if you need one now. //@anonymous: Yesterday it was 269
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Yesterday it was 269
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Costco's price is lowest at $409
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Other than the fact that annual profits are inscrutable it's all good. //@Anonymous: What is this non-sense? Have either of you actually learned the history and annual profits of either company since they both started? Don’t think you would be saying any of this if you did. //@anonymous: Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Amazing! Apple is so far beyond any would be competitor. //@anonymous: The new iPad will have usb-c connector. It will 3x speed of lightning.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
The new iPad will have usb-c connector. It will 3x speed of lightning.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Waiting for iPad Air deal. 10.9 inch.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Until you build up apps //@Anonymous: I would rather spend extra money to buy a iPad Pro instead of a larger-storage but regular-size iPad.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Amazon isnt all that great. I left them like 8 years ago. Only use a friends for certain things when i need it. //@Anonymous: Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
What is this non-sense? Have either of you actually learned the history and annual profits of either company since they both started? Don’t think you would be saying any of this if you did. //@anonymous: Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, agreed. Buy it from other stores instead of Amazon. //@Anonymous: Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Very good deal.
Walmart is working hard to compete with its competitors in terms of pricing, faster shipping and easiest return. This way we can avoid e-commence monopoly.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Adding a microSD card slot would be smart
4 years ago |
Anonymous
"big storage size" vs "small storage size" in the same Gen iPad. No one talks about iPad4 vs iPad8 //@Anonymous: Nope. Some old Ipad were impossible to upgrade even you have Icloud //@Anonymous: money for ipad / iphone storage can be better spent for icloud.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Nope. Some old Ipad were impossible to upgrade even you have Icloud //@Anonymous: money for ipad / iphone storage can be better spent for icloud.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
money for ipad / iphone storage can be better spent for icloud.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I would rather spend extra money to buy a iPad Pro instead of a larger-storage but regular-size iPad.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
People complain that storage is too little. They complain that there is too much storage. Moral: people complain. //@anonymous: No more 128 Storage now, its would have been of Apple make starting Storage model as 128. Apple is greedy. Making consumers to spend more on what they don't need to spend on storage.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
No more 128 Storage now, its would have been of Apple make starting Storage model as 128. Apple is greedy. Making consumers to spend more on what they don't need to spend on storage.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Amazon -purple:
Lowest price in 30 days
$619.76 with 22 percent savings
-22% $619.76
5 months ago |
Anonymous
There are probably some values of x where this price is accurate //@anonymous: I will stick to my ps4 unless ps5 goes down to 2xx
4 months ago |
Anonymous
You are going to stick to that anyway, because it is sticky. //@anonymous: I will stick to my ass this won't drop to 2xx in next 3 years.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
I will stick to my ass this won't drop to 2xx in next 3 years.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
I will stick to my ps4 unless ps5 goes down to 2xx
5 months ago |
Anonymous
It's a budget $100 monitor. Pretty good to have 2 of these side by side at the office. //@anonymous: 1600x900? What year is this? 1995?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Didn’t even know this thing still exist these days.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Just curious, do you people say the same things about every consumer item? If not, why do it here? Should cars cost the same as 10 years ago today? //@anonymous: Consider inflation //@anonymous: i got two 23in fhd for $99 each 10 yrs ago, thru dealsea deals
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Consider inflation //@anonymous: i got two 23in fhd for $99 each 10 yrs ago, thru dealsea deals
4 years ago |
Anonymous
We are back paddling to 1999. Crappy old monitors with 1600x900 is selling for $99 in 2022. Unbelievable!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
i got two 23in fhd for $99 each 10 yrs ago, thru dealsea deals
4 years ago |
Anonymous
you can get Full HD monitor 1080p for similar price! //@Anonymous: It's a budget $100 monitor. Pretty good to have 2 of these side by side at the office. //@anonymous: 1600x900? What year is this? 1995?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
why bother with these lower end monitors. you looks at monitors alot, invest better monitors, reduce fatique of your eyes as well. //@Anonymous: It's a budget $100 monitor. Pretty good to have 2 of these side by side at the office. //@anonymous: 1600x900? What year is this? 1995?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's a budget $100 monitor. Pretty good to have 2 of these side by side at the office. //@anonymous: 1600x900? What year is this? 1995?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
1600x900? What year is this? 1995?
4 years ago |