| « Previous | 381 to 390 of 63161 | Next » |
Anonymous
Not 2022??
1 year ago |
Anonymous
https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/?modelList=watch-se-gen1,watch-se-gen2
Yes, 2022.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024
10 months ago |
Anonymous
they mean 2nd gen //@Anonymous: there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024
10 months ago |
Anonymous
I believe for the same price, you can get the Cellular on at Walmart now.
9 months ago |
Anonymous
I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
I also use my iphone to find my iwatach //@anonymous: I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.
7 months ago |
Anonymous
Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
What should a current year model cost then? Y so suspicious //@anonymous: Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Technology always advance at steady speed because of competition. With trade war and covid, sellers no longer competing. They can still jack up the price on ancient monitors instead of slashing prices. While they can make good money on these junks, there is no need to create new products. You knew nothing about technology so I don’t know how much longer you can stay in this business. //@anonymous: What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
There is another reason: US dollars become cheaper.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Costco has a samsung 27 inch curved for 149. I think that is a pretty good price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Instead of scoffing and laughing about FHD monitor prices how about showing where you can get a better FHD monitor for the same price? Pointless to say it’s not worth it otherwise. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Officedepot/officemax has se2722h for 89.99, a much better deal.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Came back two years later to say this? Go ahead and show the UHD price else you sound like a fool. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
5 years ago |
limarcus
all label printers use thermal transfer technology, no ink/toner consumption at all, the thermal transfer has the advantage of low consumable cost and fast printing, but the downside is considerably low printing resolution. And the thermal mechanism dominated most of its cost. This dual printer model should be used in a fast pace environment like takeout counter to double printer efficiency and at this price point, this one is unbeatable //@Anonymous: Market share? Fewer people buy these, I assume, which means lower demand to defray overhead. Also, I suspect the ink/toner is of a different, more expensive composition to account for the use, and the mechanisms must handle heavier media. Kind of makes sense to me, though I am no expert in ANY OF THESE FIELDS... //@Anonymous: Why are these so expensive? It is essentially a printer.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
4 years ago |
limarcus
NO, I'm sorry to say, UPS shipping label is 4*6" and this model doesn't support that size //@anonymous: can I print a USPS shipping label with this? is the barcode good enough for USPS to read?
4 years ago |
| « Previous | 381 to 390 of 63161 | Next » |
Anonymous
Shipper / Seller
PNWB Office Products
10 months ago |