Anonymous

$339.99??

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Infinity

Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

onceternal

No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

RoshDrozzley

Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.

Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.

//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

not 120hz, sad

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.

4 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

What should a current year model cost then? Y so suspicious //@anonymous: Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.

4 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.

4 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.

4 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

Technology always advance at steady speed because of competition. With trade war and covid, sellers no longer competing. They can still jack up the price on ancient monitors instead of slashing prices. While they can make good money on these junks, there is no need to create new products. You knew nothing about technology so I don’t know how much longer you can stay in this business. //@anonymous: What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

There is another reason: US dollars become cheaper.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Costco has a samsung 27 inch curved for 149. I think that is a pretty good price.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.

4 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

Instead of scoffing and laughing about FHD monitor prices how about showing where you can get a better FHD monitor for the same price? Pointless to say it’s not worth it otherwise. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.

4 years ago Up 8 | Reply

Anonymous

Officedepot/officemax has se2722h for 89.99, a much better deal.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Came back two years later to say this? Go ahead and show the UHD price else you sound like a fool. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Nice, as a prime member, I got $20 prime discount, and there is an $75 amazon gift card as well. Plan to buy "just dance" for VR exercising！

1 year ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

sweet deal. Is it targeted //@Anonymous: Nice, as a prime member, I got $20 prime discount, and there is an $75 amazon gift card as well. Plan to buy "just dance" for VR exercising！

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply