« Previous | 371 to 380 of 55097 | Next » |
Anonymous
its 999
1 month ago |
Anonymous
999
1 month ago |
Anonymous
It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Thanks! Best monitor deal this week!
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Hot deal
5 years ago |
Anonymous
21.5" is too small.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Don't know why this would be a deal. I saw 24" for only $60, 27" for $90.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
All in
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Could you talk more about where the deals can be found? //@anonymous: Don't know why this would be a deal. I saw 24" for only $60, 27" for $90.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Could you say more about where the deals could be found? //@anonymous: Don't know why this would be a deal. I saw 24" for only $60, 27" for $90.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Amazon just trying to repeat whatever the deal others had, the cost most likely will be lower anyway...
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Very similar to price and model at Costco. Amazon trying to compete? //@anonymous: Amazon just trying to repeat whatever the deal others had, the cost most likely will be lower anyway...
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Who is still buying FHD? It is sort of out dated
5 years ago |
Anonymous
For kids computer and for
5 years ago |
Anonymous
FHD (1080P) on 21.5" panel is acceptable, but on 24" is not.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Nice display with good price. Eyes feeling comfortable. Tilt too. No complaint. //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
22" FHD is perfect for office work. //@Anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Dual monitor for office work. Cheaper than 30" monitor and better resolution. //@Anonymous: 22" FHD is perfect for office work. //@Anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Depending on job. Could be perfect for front desk. //@Anonymous: 22" FHD is perfect for office work. //@Anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
People who want to save money and do not see the difference sufficiently to pay more. //@Anonymous: Who is still buying FHD? It is sort of out dated
5 years ago |
Anonymous
It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Which middle school did you go? Conveniently ignored the context for "specifications" and started your rant picking a word "slow". //@anonymous: It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Does NOT have vesa mount
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Monitor spec doesn't impact computer speed. You should educate yourself about technology little bit before placing your suggestions and recommendations. //@Anonymous: It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
when you can type 180 characters in a second, you perceive time differently when using a computer. at 6 characters a word, that is 1800 words per minute, a really evolved human which is goodest worker //@Anonymous: Monitor spec doesn't impact computer speed. You should educate yourself about technology little bit before placing your suggestions and recommendations. //@Anonymous: It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I am using this tech //@anonymous: when you can type 180 characters in a second, you perceive time differently when using a computer. at 6 characters a word, that is 1800 words per minute, a really evolved human which is goodest worker //@Anonymous: Monitor spec doesn't impact computer speed. You should educate yourself about technology little bit before placing your suggestions and recommendations. //@Anonymous: It is very slow! I totally understand that you can type more than 180 characters in a second! This is simply too slow to people who worked from home! They simply don't know human being evolve faster than technology can do!!! //@Anonymous: They aren't crazy but learning slow very slow //@anonymous: Are these people crazy? this is like last decade's specification. Who is still using 21.5" with FHD.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
because I can't find an app for that?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Wow.. more expensive than kindle
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I paid about $100 on it when I was in college .... 10 years ago. If you factor in inflation, the price here $76 is actually pretty good. I'd get one if I need it
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I bought TI-89 back 1991 when I took Linear Equations. My professor made me to buy it. It was requirement to pass his class. //@Anonymous: I paid about $100 on it when I was in college .... 10 years ago. If you factor in inflation, the price here $76 is actually pretty good. I'd get one if I need it
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Tell your professor that linear equation existed before graphing calculators and show him how to do it by hand. j/k, mostly, of course, but seriously. //@Anonymous: I bought TI-89 back 1991 when I took Linear Equations. My professor made me to buy it. It was requirement to pass his class. //@Anonymous: I paid about $100 on it when I was in college .... 10 years ago. If you factor in inflation, the price here $76 is actually pretty good. I'd get one if I need it
4 years ago |
Anonymous
wolfram for $3.99, you can use it all the way to math PhD //@Anonymous: because I can't find an app for that?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I still have my casio scientific calculator from 30+ years ago and it still works. It got me through 2 engineering degrees. They might have been the first to have calculators with continuous calculation (exe instead of equal sign). I bought one of those TI financial calculators just for my professional engineering exam and it broke right after. I think there is a conspiracy to promote TI products in the US in schools. Just look at a syllabus and see if there is mention of casio. Casio was better than TI in my days and I still think it is.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I had a Casio graphing calc in hs. Piece of junk used coin cell batteries that needed replacing every 3 weeks. When I got to university, I skipped the "kids" calculators and bought an HP RPN
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I am using a Ti-84 Plus CE from several years ago. Previously, I used my Casio to get my Ph.D. degrees. But, I will never go back to Casio again. TI is fantastic.
BTW: I teach college-level engineering mechanics. TI-84 plus is good enough for most engineering courses, but I will recommend a newer/higher version.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
If your engineering students are going to take PE exam(s), please read below: "To protect the integrity of its exams, NCEES limits the types of calculators examinees may bring to exam sites. The list of approved calculators is reviewed annually.
The following calculator models are the only ones acceptable for use during the 2020 exams:
Casio: All fx-115 and fx-991 models (Any Casio calculator must have “fx-115” or “fx-991” in its model name.)Hewlett Packard: The HP 33s and HP 35s models, but no othersTexas Instruments: All TI-30X and TI-36X models (Any Texas Instruments calculator must have “TI-30X” or “TI-36X” in its model name.)" //@Anonymous: I am using a Ti-84 Plus CE from several years ago. Previously, I used my Casio to get my Ph.D. degrees. But, I will never go back to Casio again. TI is fantastic.
BTW: I teach college-level engineering mechanics. TI-84 plus is good enough for most engineering courses, but I will recommend a newer/higher version.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
We disprove how the TI controls the market and had refused to buy one for a long time. On the other hand, I’m so glad that I ordered one a couple weeks ago. My 9th grader was able to use TI during his math test right away! I often pays just as much for a Cross fountain pen anyway!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's 76 last year. 91 this year
4 years ago |
Anonymous
6.5% inflation is better than many other market segments right now //@anonymous: It's 76 last year. 91 this year
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Inflation in this year alone will be over this number //@anonymous: 6.5% inflation is better than many other market segments right now //@anonymous: It's 76 last year. 91 this year
4 years ago |
Anonymous
with the chip shortage, this should go up in price even more. the chips inside these things probably 20 years old, who has that anymore?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this good for high school student? it seems too much for me. I prefer a simpler one.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
paid 86 for $5 at thrift store last month, i don't even need it.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I teach college math. Ti83/84 is a must.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
for ACT test, you would need TI-84 plus CE:) //@anonymous: Is this good for high school student? it seems too much for me. I prefer a simpler one.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
II know it has graphics but isn't this is "graphing" calculator?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
What kind of GPU does this have?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I don't know how TI made the list of "qualified calculators for tests", but surely its a sweet deal for them. Year after year, high schools kids have to buy them. To me the tech on these calculators are kind of ancient, and any $5 app on the smart phone can beat it easily.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
TI is a semi company, they have all kinds of chips. //@Anonymous: with the chip shortage, this should go up in price even more. the chips inside these things probably 20 years old, who has that anymore?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Now $101.00
2 years ago |
Anonymous
How can Moore's law apply to PCs but not to calculators? //@anonymous: Inflation in this year alone will be over this number //@anonymous: 6.5% inflation is better than many other market segments right now //@anonymous: It's 76 last year. 91 this year
2 years ago |
« Previous | 371 to 380 of 55097 | Next » |
Anonymous
But be careful, Amazon sellers also sell the fake variant.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, these buds are far, far better than any others and this price is good. There is a reason why you see so many people using AirPods and nobody uses other brands. //@Anonymous: is this a good deal?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
is this a good deal?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, these buds are far, far better than any others and this price is good. There is a reason why you see so many people using AirPods and nobody uses other brands. //@Anonymous: is this a good deal?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Same chip as Gen 2.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Costco has the same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
149.99 at Costco //@Anonymous: Costco has the same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Most amazing!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Boy howdy, it is a great deal! //@anonymous: is this a good deal?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I lost track, is 3rd generation the latest/current ?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes - Gen 3 is the latest for the regular Airpods. For 'Pro" version, the latest is Gen 2 //@Anonymous: I lost track, is 3rd generation the latest/current ?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
But be careful, Amazon sellers also sell the fake variant.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Bought a pair thanks
2 years ago |
Anonymous
They are the best
2 years ago |
Anonymous
HOT deal!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
super hot. gen 3! //@anonymous: HOT deal!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
4Th generation is coming
2 years ago |
Anonymous
YES!! When?!? I’m getting this 3rd Gen. now but I’ll be ready to get Gen. 4 as soon as it comes out! :D //@anonymous: 4Th generation is coming
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It’s not hot deal, it’s good deal if you are planning to buy now, only $20 off.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
These work great for music, gaming or even phone calls, unlike competing products. There is literally nothing Apple cannot do better than other companies.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
WOW! AWESOME!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
How about siri? Also there is nothing Apple can’t charge less than other companies. //@anonymous: These work great for music, gaming or even phone calls, unlike competing products. There is literally nothing Apple cannot do better than other companies.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
169.99 at costco
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It is also good because many people (including me) don't like the plug in the Pro version.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
No noise cancellation at this price range? //@Anonymous: Yes, these buds are far, far better than any others and this price is good. There is a reason why you see so many people using AirPods and nobody uses other brands. //@Anonymous: is this a good deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Till end of month, Costco has them for $139 in the store
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Costco: Apple AirPods (3rd Generation) with MagSafe Charging Case for $139.99 #skc
1 year ago |