| « Previous | 2961 to 2970 of 5618 | Next » |
Anonymous
The monitor is on lower arm in picture, not on "Upper Arm"
8 years ago |
Anonymous
It's higher in elevation than the arm resting, thus the upper arm. //@Anonymous: The monitor is on lower arm in picture, not on "Upper Arm"
8 years ago |
Anonymous
It does not coast $15.00 anymore //@Anonymous: The monitor is on lower arm in picture, not on "Upper Arm"
8 years ago |
Anonymous
can't do photo editing.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Why not? //@anonymous: can't do photo editing.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Specs say 4K resolution.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Because it uses a TN panel.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
TN panel for 4k UHD, Dell is greedy to fool non tech people.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Could you please write more about it? I am interested in this monitor but I don't know is any problem with it. Thanks! //@Anonymous: TN panel for 4k UHD, Dell is greedy to fool non tech people.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Could you please write more about it? I am interested in this monitor but I don't know what's the problem. Thanks //@Anonymous: TN panel for 4k UHD, Dell is greedy to fool non tech people.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
It all boils down what's your budget. TN has faster response time and it's cheaper; it's fine for everyday computer use and gaming. Choose IPS if you care about the viewing angle and color reproduction, and most of all have money to spend. Google LCD technologies (specifically in TN and IPS) for more details. //@Anonymous: Could you please write more about it? I am interested in this monitor but I don't know what's the problem. Thanks //@Anonymous: TN panel for 4k UHD, Dell is greedy to fool non tech people.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
TN is no necessarily bad, fast response, easy in eyes. The downside is viewing angle. But not everyone need wide viewing angle. Some people intentionally don’t want a lot of people to see his screen
8 years ago |
Anonymous
No, color sucks in TN panel. //@anonymous: TN is no necessarily bad, fast response, easy in eyes. The downside is viewing angle. But not everyone need wide viewing angle. Some people intentionally don’t want a lot of people to see his screen
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Ok reviews
8 years ago |
Anonymous
most important thing is the picture shows input ports, don't know why they use the number sticker block the ports? mental illness!
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Vga mini din hdmi one of each //@anonymous: most important thing is the picture shows input ports, don't know why they use the number sticker block the ports? mental illness!
8 years ago |
Anonymous
Price now $168
8 years ago |
Anonymous
excellent, equal 3, 24 inchs, not heavy.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
But only has 2 hdmi ports //@anonymous: excellent, equal 3, 24 inchs, not heavy.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
equals 2 1920x2 =3840 //@anonymous: excellent, equal 3, 24 inchs, not heavy.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
how much radiation a head will get?
8 years ago |
Anonymous
If it were a CRT if worry about the radiation, but in this case your cell phone is like 1000 times the radiation.
8 years ago |
| « Previous | 2961 to 2970 of 5618 | Next » |
Anonymous
the only problem is lack of 4k video content. Not an hardware issue.
8 years ago |
Anonymous
This is NOT a 4K monitor, airhead.
8 years ago |