Anonymous

no touch screen, over priced, pass.

3 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

also not Ryzen CPU - NG

3 years ago Up 6 | Reply

Anonymous

is Ryzen better than Intel? //@Anonymous: also not Ryzen CPU - NG

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

much more energy efficient yet faster, also less expensive. Ryzen is getting better and better. Watch out for next Ryzen 6000 series for notebook and Ryzen 7000 (Zen 4) for desktops!!! //@Anonymous: is Ryzen better than Intel? //@Anonymous: also not Ryzen CPU - NG

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Nice laptop

2 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

This is really a great laptop. Best in this price range for a gaming deck. //@Anonymous: Nice laptop

2 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

11370H is not so good actually //@Anonymous: This is really a great laptop. Best in this price range for a gaming deck. //@Anonymous: Nice laptop

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Hot deal

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Amazing laptop!! //@anonymous: Hot deal

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

21:9 2560x1080 Ultra Wide Ultra Slim HDMI DisplayPort up to 200Hz Build-in Speakers

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply