Anonymous

I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

deal?

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

for 27", you need 4K resolution. //@Anonymous: deal?

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

thanks

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

It's only true if you're not gaming. //@anonymous: for 27", you need 4K resolution. //@Anonymous: deal?

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

you can buy this at walmart ( I believe the same price). IMO this is not a deal.

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply