| « Previous | 251 to 260 of 5449 | Next » |
Anonymous
PS5 //@Anonymous: PS5 or a monitor?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
dead
5 years ago |
Harry
Back in stock.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Now all over $600 :( Thanks tho, I want this one! Keeps selling out.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
delivery in October 2020
5 years ago |
Anonymous
PS5 and the new RTX cards are coming out, QHD gaming is dead time to upgrade to 4K
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Goodluck getting 144hz 4k even with the 3080 next gen. 144hz is the sweet spot for 144fps ultra settings for the next gen consoles.
Who wants to game at 4k ultra 60 fps? Doom Eternal (an easy benchmark for great graphics but high frame rate) barely cracks 125 fps. //@anonymous: PS5 and the new RTX cards are coming out, QHD gaming is dead time to upgrade to 4K
5 years ago |
Anonymous
lol are you a pro gamer? why are you so fixated on refresh rate. 4K @60fps is plenty enough for 90% of the games don't believe me just look at how many ppl are buying ps5. You can still do 144hz on 1080p you just don't need an expensive gpu or monitor //@Anonymous: Goodluck getting 144hz 4k even with the 3080 next gen. 144hz is the sweet spot for 144fps ultra settings for the next gen consoles.
Who wants to game at 4k ultra 60 fps? Doom Eternal (an easy benchmark for great graphics but high frame rate) barely cracks 125 fps. //@anonymous: PS5 and the new RTX cards are coming out, QHD gaming is dead time to upgrade to 4K
5 years ago |
Anonymous
QHD is such a stopgap as I predicted by spring these can be had for $300
4 years ago |
Anonymous
PS5 or a monitor?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
AOC was AOC, long before AOC
4 years ago |
Anonymous
PS5 //@Anonymous: PS5 or a monitor?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
AOC???
4 years ago |
Anonymous
This AOC monitor works better than the other AOC in Congress. //@anonymous: AOC???
4 years ago |
| « Previous | 251 to 260 of 5449 | Next » |
Anonymous
$339.99??
4 years ago |
Infinity
Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??
4 years ago |
Anonymous
what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
onceternal
No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
RoshDrozzley
Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.
Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.
//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
not 120hz, sad
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
1 year ago |