« Previous | 20761 to 20770 of 54394 | Next » |
Anonymous
first link is wrong
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Incorrect Link
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Incorrect link for Kit Kat
2 years ago |
mutongo
Updated, thanks. //@anonymous: Incorrect link for Kit Kat
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I guess I’ll need 12 of these for my 12-pack.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
So for almost $150 bucks you can get a decent small fridge to put all your cans in... //@Anonymous: I guess I’ll need 12 of these for my 12-pack.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Still showing $11.97 per jar
2 years ago |
Anonymous
50’, not 200
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I think the 200' sold out. I managed to get one. //@Anonymous: 50’, not 200
2 years ago |
Anonymous
$12.97, got it. Thanks!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The tape was off 1 1/2 inches at 120ft. Very inaccurate.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Funny guy //@anonymous: The tape was off 1 1/2 inches at 120ft. Very inaccurate.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Any tape would sag at 120'. You can't pull it hard enough to keep it straight or it breaks. Was it off 1.5" when you laid it on a flat surface or pulled in the air ? //@anonymous: The tape was off 1 1/2 inches at 120ft. Very inaccurate.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Don’t bother explaining. If this person really is complaining about a deviation of 1.5” accuracy at 120’ they are using the wrong tool for the job. //@anonymous: Any tape would sag at 120'. You can't pull it hard enough to keep it straight or it breaks. Was it off 1.5" when you laid it on a flat surface or pulled in the air ? //@anonymous: The tape was off 1 1/2 inches at 120ft. Very inaccurate.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I think this guy just copied and pasted an Amazon review //@anonymous: Funny guy //@anonymous: The tape was off 1 1/2 inches at 120ft. Very inaccurate.
2 years ago |
« Previous | 20761 to 20770 of 54394 | Next » |
Anonymous
Also extra 20% on environmental friendly package
2 years ago |