Anonymous

Good?

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

One of the best for this price //@Anonymous: Good?

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Good enough, yes! //@anonymous: Good?

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

The title says $159 but the descriptions says "Amazon has Brother MFC-L2717DW Monochrome Compact Laser All-in-One Printer for $179.88".

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Ink tank is cartridge, not the 'tank' refillable ink as other brands use.

3 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Inkvestment haha. The marketing department at Brother is letting the interns name things.

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Was $79 dollars in July.

4 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

They print a lot of money after July... //@Anonymous: Was $79 dollars in July.

4 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

Good printer, and it’s 3rd party cartridge is cheap.

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Office Depot and Staples have this printer on sale a few times a year. Never paid more than $89 for one, and I used these in my tax office for years. Good printer, and, as mentioned, good, cheap third party cartridges available. HOT TIP....You can get an easy extra 1000 pages by covering the clear window on the cartridge. //@Anonymous: Was $79 dollars in July.

4 years ago Up 8 | Reply

Anonymous

Can you explain the steps? Thanks "HOT TIP....You can get an easy extra 1000 pages by covering the clear window on the cartridge." //@anonymous: Office Depot and Staples have this printer on sale a few times a year. Never paid more than $89 for one, and I used these in my tax office for years. Good printer, and, as mentioned, good, cheap third party cartridges available. HOT TIP....You can get an easy extra 1000 pages by covering the clear window on the cartridge. //@Anonymous: Was $79 dollars in July.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

You only need to do the tape covering when using OEM toner. (That's how manufacturers get ya to buy more before needed)

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Terrible printer. I bought this six months ago and have had to replace it. Don’t waste your money.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Please explain! //@anonymous: You only need to do the tape covering when using OEM toner. (That's how manufacturers get ya to buy more before needed)

4 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

Got same one 69.99 last summer.

4 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Price aside, this is a great great printer. Mine has been working flawlessly for over 5 years //@anonymous: Got same one 69.99 last summer.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Is it wireless?

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

All in

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Yes. The "W" in the model number means it is wireless, and the "D" means it is duplex //@anonymous: Is it wireless?

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

wan031

The price increases a lot! Inflation or higher demand?

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

corporation taking advantage of "inflation" to maximize profit. //@wan031: The price increases a lot! Inflation or higher demand?

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

buy it now? or see 199.99 //@Anonymous: corporation taking advantage of "inflation" to maximize profit. //@wan031: The price increases a lot! Inflation or higher demand?

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Price showing $180, not $119.99

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

$89 last week

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

76 only

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Was 60 before the pandemic

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic

2 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

I think you missed the point. I wasn’t saying anything about any one else’s comment except yours. Calling out prices from 3+ years ago is nonsense. Makes zero difference. Change your focus, you might see something nice. //@anonymous: The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply