| « Previous | 1911 to 1920 of 2600 | Next » |
Anonymous
Cole Haan Men's Original Grand Wingtip Oxford
Link doesn't work
5 years ago |
Infinity
That one is sold out now. //@anonymous: Cole Haan Men's Original Grand Wingtip Oxford
Link doesn't work
5 years ago |
Anonymous
A 32 inch monitor should be atleast 2k or 4k resolution. Full HD resolution (1920×1080) on a 32" monitor is very low.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
I have this monitor. As the user above mentioned the 1080 res on this 32" is problematic. I got it for the split screen functionality 2 years ago but due to the resolution everything is too big. //@Anonymous: A 32 inch monitor should be atleast 2k or 4k resolution. Full HD resolution (1920×1080) on a 32" monitor is very low.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
2K is full HD //@Anonymous: A 32 inch monitor should be atleast 2k or 4k resolution. Full HD resolution (1920×1080) on a 32" monitor is very low.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
You have no idea what you are talking about //@anonymous: 2K is full HD //@Anonymous: A 32 inch monitor should be atleast 2k or 4k resolution. Full HD resolution (1920×1080) on a 32" monitor is very low.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Fine, what the person means is 1440p or 2.5k.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
2K is Full HD. The number is always 2x. //@anonymous: You have no idea what you are talking about //@anonymous: 2K is full HD //@Anonymous: A 32 inch monitor should be atleast 2k or 4k resolution. Full HD resolution (1920×1080) on a 32" monitor is very low.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Be ware: VESA Mounting Standard is 200x100, not usual 100x100.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
It's not good for computer screen, but you can use it as a TV. Just plug a FireTV stick, or anything similar to the HDMI socket.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes,full HD is too low for 32" monitor. I bought a 29"HD monitor and realized my mistake
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Horrible pixelation! 1080p on 32-inch is terrible.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Not good. Will return
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Out of stock
5 years ago |
Anonymous
OOS
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Delivery currently running 14+ business days on this item. We apologize for the inconvenience.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Nice! Pay a little more and don't have to get in line.
5 years ago |
| « Previous | 1911 to 1920 of 2600 | Next » |
Anonymous
Better than over priced iPad.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
how is this compared to ipad?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
iPad is better than this, but this is still ok
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Is it worth for this price or the S6 is more worth it?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Snapdragon 675 soc...very limited gaming capacity. Decent screen for watching videos. Does not support S-pen and no headphone jack...
5 years ago |
Anonymous
In bestbuy, it costs $479.99. So it is a deal.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
The only tablet to buy in the market now is actually the iPad. Its software library support and polishness is much better than any android tablet. If you just want to watch videos on the tablet , do yourself a favor just get the amazon Fire HD, which is only 150 dollars(and often 100 dollars on sale).
This Samsung tablet is really in the odd spot. Not as cheap as the Fire HD, and not as good as iPad.
5 years ago |
Anonymous
That is not true. Android app library on these tablets is at par with Ipad. //@Anonymous: The only tablet to buy in the market now is actually the iPad. Its software library support and polishness is much better than any android tablet. If you just want to watch videos on the tablet , do yourself a favor just get the amazon Fire HD, which is only 150 dollars(and often 100 dollars on sale).
This Samsung tablet is really in the odd spot. Not as cheap as the Fire HD, and not as good as iPad.
5 years ago |