« Previous | 1151 to 1160 of 54997 | Next » |
Anonymous
16.49
19 hours ago |
Anonymous
prime only
2 years ago |
cheetah
Thanks, updated. //@anonymous: prime only
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The best Kindle I have used.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
This is not the latest version, right?
2 months ago |
cheetah
Here's the newest version https://dealsea.com/view-deal/1961426 //@anonymous: This is not the latest version, right?
2 months ago |
Anonymous
It is LCD with Oled backlight.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Wrong. This OLED is emissive as all OLEDs are.
2 years ago |
« Previous | 1151 to 1160 of 54997 | Next » |
Anonymous
$339.99??
4 years ago |
Infinity
Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??
4 years ago |
Anonymous
what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
onceternal
No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
RoshDrozzley
Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.
Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.
//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
not 120hz, sad
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
1 year ago |