Anonymous
Got an Ultra on the first day it was released. So far so good. The battery life is more than three days with always-on off. I know Garmin has more battery life but three days battery life is enough for me. Garmin does have more features but I am not a hardcore outdoor enthusiast so I am pleased with this watch.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
It's apple!!! //@anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Only $40 more? It’s $799 regular price. $140 more for minor upgrades. //@anonymous: This is not a deal at all. It’s the 2022 model and hardly discounted. Not sure why this is posted as a deal when the ultra 2 has more features for $40 more
6 months ago |
Anonymous
You mean Rolex? //@anonymous: Why a watch worths more than a laptop?
6 months ago |
Anonymous
This is not a deal at all. It’s the 2022 model and hardly discounted. Not sure why this is posted as a deal when the ultra 2 has more features for $40 more
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Why a watch worths more than a laptop?
7 months ago |
Anonymous
22 //@anonymous: Is this a 2022 or 2023 model?
7 months ago |
Anonymous
Is this a 2022 or 2023 model?
7 months ago |
cheetah
Sorry, expired. //@anonymous: i don't see the 50$ off at the checkout.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
i don't see the 50$ off at the checkout.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Preach! //@anonymous: Awesome updates. Time to upgrade! Haters gonna hate. Gotta ignore them.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Awesome updates. Time to upgrade! Haters gonna hate. Gotta ignore them.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Garmin so much more useful and 20 days of battery
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Typical Apple gimmick. It’s either changing the color of the case, bigger battery, or the look of the case.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
It doesn't work for medium orange: Alpine Loop 145-190mm
1 year ago |
Anonymous
It is so close $500 range and I will upgrade it. //@Anonymous: Got an Ultra on the first day it was released. So far so good. The battery life is more than three days with always-on off. I know Garmin has more battery life but three days battery life is enough for me. Garmin does have more features but I am not a hardcore outdoor enthusiast so I am pleased with this watch.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Highly overrated
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Garmin Epix Gen 2 has 16 days battery life with always on off. //@Anonymous: Got an Ultra on the first day it was released. So far so good. The battery life is more than three days with always-on off. I know Garmin has more battery life but three days battery life is enough for me. Garmin does have more features but I am not a hardcore outdoor enthusiast so I am pleased with this watch.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
It's apple!!! //@anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
You can't take gold with you into the afterlife. //@anonymous: Apple likes gold. It holds its value very well and even it gets old. //@Anonymous: You know what else is? //@anonymous: Apple is cute short smart,Garmin is tough, long, and rough. //@anonymous: Don't even compare them lol //@anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Apple likes gold. It holds its value very well and even it gets old. //@Anonymous: You know what else is? //@anonymous: Apple is cute short smart,Garmin is tough, long, and rough. //@anonymous: Don't even compare them lol //@anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Got an Ultra on the first day it was released. So far so good. The battery life is more than three days with always-on off. I know Garmin has more battery life but three days battery life is enough for me. Garmin does have more features but I am not a hardcore outdoor enthusiast so I am pleased with this watch.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
You know what else is? //@anonymous: Apple is cute short smart,Garmin is tough, long, and rough. //@anonymous: Don't even compare them lol //@anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Apple is cute short smart,Garmin is tough, long, and rough. //@anonymous: Don't even compare them lol //@anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Don't even compare them lol //@anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Still serves different audiences. Rugged Apple watch is still for van campers and Garmin Fenix is for real outdoor enthusiasts. 8 days on Garmin battery vs 3 days on Apple (both less time when GPS is active) //@anonymous: fenix 7 is way better though //@Anonymous: it is a deal comparing with Garmin Fenix 7. what is your question again? //@Anonymous: And where is the deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
it is the same price in apple store
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Yeah, this is good. ASUS has really picked up their game and is making great laptops these days. Lenovo is eating ASUS' dust right now.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
All in
1 year ago |
Anonymous
where are free 6 piece gifts?
1 week ago |
Anonymous
-24% $106.57
2 weeks ago |
Anonymous
An Apple AitPot? For making Apple iTea? Where can I buy it? //@anonymous: Dang, that’s the nice newest apple airpot.
1 week ago |
Anonymous
Dang, that’s the nice newest apple airpot.
1 week ago |
Anonymous
The coupon code "BRUSHDEAL" is not valid.
1 week ago |
Anonymous
yes, 34" monitor at least should have QHD resolution.
The price for FHD should be $99, not $199. //@Anonymous: Yep, FHD is too low for 34 inches screen. //@Anonymous: I would be more concerned about the low resolution for 34 size than the curve if you would use it as a computer monitor. //@Anonymous: Good to know //@anonymous: Curved is not good as many others are not. //@anonymous: Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Yep, FHD is too low for 34 inches screen. //@Anonymous: I would be more concerned about the low resolution for 34 size than the curve if you would use it as a computer monitor. //@Anonymous: Good to know //@anonymous: Curved is not good as many others are not. //@anonymous: Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
I would be more concerned about the low resolution for 34 size than the curve if you would use it as a computer monitor. //@Anonymous: Good to know //@anonymous: Curved is not good as many others are not. //@anonymous: Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Good to know //@anonymous: Curved is not good as many others are not. //@anonymous: Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Curved is not good as many others are not. //@anonymous: Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Not curved?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Gamers aren’t smart. They will buy anything labeled “for gaming”. //@onceternal: For which game you would need this microphone? How can it help you game better when compared to lower cost mics? I am just curious.
2 years ago |
onceternal
For which game you would need this microphone? How can it help you game better when compared to lower cost mics? I am just curious.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Just bought this brand but a RGB version from Bestbuy. Bestbuy is selling the RGB version for $160, while most of other sellers are selling for ~$230. Bought on 1/8/21, says pick up on 1/19/21. Performance-wise, it about the same as the Yeti Pro, but the RGB one is more beautiful I think.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Youtube it //@anonymous: how this compare with Blue Yeti
3 years ago |
Anonymous
how this compare with Blue Yeti
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I have a few Shure MX412s. Very good sensitivity. Only can sell $20 on ebay. BhPhoto sells for $288. Only need a $15 adaptor to PC.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
tgt,bb also,have it
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Black only, white is $299
11 months ago |
cheetah
Already updated, thanks! //@anonymous: That photo doesn't look like a montior. But what do I know.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
That photo doesn't look like a montior. But what do I know.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
engineered with perfection //@Anonymous: dies just after warranty
2 months ago |
Anonymous
dies just after warranty
2 months ago |
Anonymous
I think you missed the point. I wasn’t saying anything about any one else’s comment except yours. Calling out prices from 3+ years ago is nonsense. Makes zero difference. Change your focus, you might see something nice. //@anonymous: The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
1 year ago |
Anonymous
The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Was 60 before the pandemic
1 year ago |
Anonymous
76 only
2 years ago |
Anonymous
HP printers can scan just fine I have been using HP products for many years. PEBCAK //@anonymous: No thanks HP, you took away my ability to scan on your printer.
6 months ago |
Anonymous
No thanks HP, you took away my ability to scan on your printer.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
Maximum RAM Supported
32 GB
1 week ago |
Anonymous
300 and i5 never went together, thanks
1 week ago |
Anonymous
no deal, new gen coming.
1 month ago |
Anonymous
We can argue specs, updates & quality until we're blue in the face. Bottom line is this is NOT a deal, it's at MSRP and in my opinion should not be posted on a deal site.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The standard S21 unlock for U.S not Asia or oversea model is still $700 unless you can fine one on sale for $600.
The spec are only a little better, not by much. But spec alone can't say one phone is better than the other.
The Pixel 6 have 4 years OS upgrade and 5 years security update (Samsung only 3 years and very slow waiting of OS upgrade). A clean OS without the crapware from Samsung and Free Earbuds from this deal which seems to me is a better deal, unless you care about the 5G mmWave missing.
Performance and Battery life pretty much the same as other phone around this price. The value and overall support life makes this phone a better deal unless you're someone who upgrade to a new phone every 2 or 3 years. And 128Gig version is simply to little, should be 256Gig for all standard phone that doesn't have a SD-card slot anymore.
//@Anonymous: 600bucks and FHD = mid spec
galaxy S21 is now the same price but much better spec
2 years ago |
Anonymous
just normal price
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Agree it's not a deal at all. With almost 3 year old inferior tensor 1 CPU, and buggy Google Android version, this should be $300 or less.
Google need to step up to make Android stable/reliable on Pixel phones.
10 months ago |
Anonymous
I second you. Totally agree. //@anonymous: I am typing on my Pixel 6 right now, and I have to tell you, stay away. This is the worst smartphone I have ever used. Don't want to type a lot, but a few really annoying things: unstable, apps not responding, fingerprint unlocking is a hit or miss....
10 months ago |
Anonymous
I'm using Pixel 6 Pro. it's a great phone, never had a problem. Love it!
10 months ago |
Anonymous
I am typing on my Pixel 6 right now, and I have to tell you, stay away. This is the worst smartphone I have ever used. Don't want to type a lot, but a few really annoying things: unstable, apps not responding, fingerprint unlocking is a hit or miss....
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 7 128GB unlocked is only $499 on both Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Google-Pixel-7-5G-Android-Phone/dp/B0BCQXXRJJ?psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
and Google Store https://store.google.com/us/US/config/pixel_7?sku=_pixel_phone_7_obsidian_128gb_unlocked&hl=en-US&selections=eyJDZ2EiOiJjR2w0Wld4Zk53PT0ifQ%3D%3D.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Windows phone //@anonymous: i still have nokia , any suggestion.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
i still have nokia , any suggestion.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
S21 Ultra is better value. If you don't make the effort to use ADB and get rid of Samsung software you dont like, stop complaining and do something about it. //@anonymous: Actually after many years, those Samsung crapwares have become very useful tools. I was a pixel fun, but I threw away my pixel 6 for galaxy s21 ultra. //@anonymous: All the Samsung crapware added on top really destroys the authentic android experience //@anonymous: get a Samsung S22, it is much better phone and about the same price with tread in enhancement and bonus. I spend about 700 dollar get a S22 ULTRA(paid 1000 dollar but get a sumsung water 4 classic, a wireless charger, tread in an worthless Iphone SE for 125 dollar.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Google pixel 6/pro disappointed us .... Don't buy...even pixel 3xl is better than 6/6pro
1 year ago |
Anonymous
BBY S22 ultra 512GB for 1049.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Sumsung galaxy is good.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 6 Pro 128 GB for $599!
Isn't this a great deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I started using Google phone since Nexus 4. Upgraded around every 1-2 years. Nexus 5, 6, Pixel 2, 3, 3a. Just switched to iphone 13 mini, I wonder why ????
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I've been using the galaxy s series since the s5 (base models, not + or ultra). Great experiences each time. I just got 3 S22s for 300 each (google fi new customer offer).
I've looked at the pixel each time a new one.is released, I guess the 7 is forthcoming. The camera usually ends up being the deciding factor for me. About the crapware, I hare Bixby but I like the Samsung health app. It's too bad they removed the blood oxygen sensor in the s10, that wad fun.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Google disappointed us on pixel 6 and pro ..... that's it.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Actually after many years, those Samsung crapwares have become very useful tools. I was a pixel fun, but I threw away my pixel 6 for galaxy s21 ultra. //@anonymous: All the Samsung crapware added on top really destroys the authentic android experience //@anonymous: get a Samsung S22, it is much better phone and about the same price with tread in enhancement and bonus. I spend about 700 dollar get a S22 ULTRA(paid 1000 dollar but get a sumsung water 4 classic, a wireless charger, tread in an worthless Iphone SE for 125 dollar.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
All the Samsung crapware added on top really destroys the authentic android experience //@anonymous: get a Samsung S22, it is much better phone and about the same price with tread in enhancement and bonus. I spend about 700 dollar get a S22 ULTRA(paid 1000 dollar but get a sumsung water 4 classic, a wireless charger, tread in an worthless Iphone SE for 125 dollar.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
get a Samsung S22, it is much better phone and about the same price with tread in enhancement and bonus. I spend about 700 dollar get a S22 ULTRA(paid 1000 dollar but get a sumsung water 4 classic, a wireless charger, tread in an worthless Iphone SE for 125 dollar.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
overprice. waiting.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I'll disagree, I have the S21 and looked closely at the Pixel 6. Camera quality on the S21 is substantially better. Google advertising their "magic eraser" feature like it's unique to the Pixel, but it's part of the google gallery app, I have it on my S21 and it works (most of the time).
For build quality, longevity, etc, I've had great luck with my Galaxy phones.
To each their own.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Multiple bugs including poor battery life reported in recent reviews. As a long-time pixel user, it’s painful to see where it has headed to //@anonymous: Pixel 6 is the first Google phone using its own newly designed chip. Usually it will take a couple round iteration to make chip stable and mature in massive usage. Pixel 4 and 5 are different, they just use Qualcomm chip, even they are not the top specs, but they are at least stable. For Pixel 6 you never know if it has stability issue because its chip is the first iteration from Google. //@Anonymous: Questionable quality? More like you are basing this over your personal poor experience from one company to another. And I get it customer service matters as to hardware too.So I'll give you mine perspective, I had used Google's Nexus 4 and 5 and never had hardware issue. Sure the 6 had, and some Pixel line, but does that mean all of Google series was poorly design? No, you simply had bought a product from them design by their third party that fail your expectation.Oh, that Samsung hardware you so proudly think is well build, I Had 3 Notes and one Galaxy, from rear camera glass crack to screen flicker and random colorful line issue.... and lets not forget Airline banning it from battery catching smoke and fire. Plus limited to 8O percent charge. So you can keep telling yourself Samsung hardware quality must be not questionable right?? Even Apple has hardware issue, poor design on their antenna, and chipset change using intel modem with poor questionable reception.At the end of the day, you really don't know which product design change might be really good or just shit! And every company can make a good product and mistakes down the line.My thought is since this is the first time Google build a phone mostly themself, they also have more control over than their previous Pixel that were build and design with third party. And Yes their online service suck, but so does the other two!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 6 is the first Google phone using its own newly designed chip. Usually it will take a couple round iteration to make chip stable and mature in massive usage. Pixel 4 and 5 are different, they just use Qualcomm chip, even they are not the top specs, but they are at least stable. For Pixel 6 you never know if it has stability issue because its chip is the first iteration from Google. //@Anonymous: Questionable quality? More like you are basing this over your personal poor experience from one company to another. And I get it customer service matters as to hardware too.So I'll give you mine perspective, I had used Google's Nexus 4 and 5 and never had hardware issue. Sure the 6 had, and some Pixel line, but does that mean all of Google series was poorly design? No, you simply had bought a product from them design by their third party that fail your expectation.Oh, that Samsung hardware you so proudly think is well build, I Had 3 Notes and one Galaxy, from rear camera glass crack to screen flicker and random colorful line issue.... and lets not forget Airline banning it from battery catching smoke and fire. Plus limited to 8O percent charge. So you can keep telling yourself Samsung hardware quality must be not questionable right?? Even Apple has hardware issue, poor design on their antenna, and chipset change using intel modem with poor questionable reception.At the end of the day, you really don't know which product design change might be really good or just shit! And every company can make a good product and mistakes down the line.My thought is since this is the first time Google build a phone mostly themself, they also have more control over than their previous Pixel that were build and design with third party. And Yes their online service suck, but so does the other two!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Buy samsung for Android or buy iPhone.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
No!
I have been using over a month (best buy deal). Really it is a $300 flagship. Weak processor, ugly physics. //@anonymous: Is it a deal???
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I wish I bought iphone instead of pixel6.
Fingerprint stopped working, can't answer call sometimes, can not pull down notification bar, sometimes can not call voicemail....
It likes a toy, not a phone
2 years ago |
Anonymous
If it's 999.99, that's perfect price
2 months ago |
deal_hunter
Got 4K MAX and it is awesome
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I agree, the 4k is faster and has smoother operation, definitely noticeable and I think it is worth the extra money //@anonymous: Non 4k version is a very slow device. Buy 4k version instead even if you only have 1080p tv.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Non 4k version is a very slow device. Buy 4k version instead even if you only have 1080p tv.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Just ordered now //@anonymous: Oos
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Oos
2 years ago |
Anonymous
This is my experience as well. I used these to test my kid twice and the results came out negative. The next day he did a PCR test it was positive. //@anonymous: Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
No. WalMart agreed to 180 days of fixed cost to sell these. Now they said they need to make profit on it for logistical purposes. I listened to the earning call. They are scammers. //@anonymous: Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, it looks like it. But I think the $14 was discounted cause I found it selling for $24+ at a local CVS //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Has the price increased from $14?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The one I got from CVS says made in China //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Showed as available for store pickup. Just got the cancellation email. Walmart inventory system and customer service is really bad. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Harry
According to the Q&A on Amazon's product page, yes they are made in the USA. //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this kit made in the USA?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
If one believes the study (which one should), then let’s understand and believe it in it’s entirety. The study says that SENSITIVITY of BINAX NOW tests is HIGH.
Specifically, the SENSITIVITY when compared to a culture test (where virus is grown from the sample and is a much better but more time-consuming than even RT-PCR test) was HIGH (> 70%) and the Positive and Negative PREDICTIVE values were high (ie test is valuable - 100%, 92.7% respectively) even for asymptomatic cases INCLUDING for those that developed symptoms within 7 days of testing.
See “ For participants who were within 7 days of symptom onset, the BinaxNOW antigen test sensitivity was 71.1% (95% CI = 63.0%–78.4%), specificity was 100% (95% CI = 99.3%–100%), PPV was 100% (95% CI = 96.4%–100%), and NPV was 92.7% (95% CI = 90.2%–94.7%).”
The paper further advocates use of serial testing to tighten above based on additional factors - eg negative tests in high-risk environments should be confirmed with serial / confirmatory tests. It also recommends continued use of precautions as far as possible - distancing, masking, isolation even for those testing negative to mitigate personal and community transmission risk.
The tests are valuable when access to more accurate tests is challenged (like now) due to many reasons including stress on more accurate lab testing personnel and equipment. //@anonymous: You should READ the study, specifically the CDC one. In that study one of the things they test is is people who TESTED POSITIVE from the PCR test (which they confirmed with a second), and this kit STILL returned false negatives. And as I quoted directly, terrible sensitivity especially for asympomatic cases. So to summarize, even people whom we KNOW to have the virus, STILL tested falsely using these test kits. //@Anonymous: It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It's a scam. 4 negatives but my pcr result came out positive. any confusion caused by this fake test kit makes it worse than not having it.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy. //@anonymous: Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
That's right, HCov-229E, HCov-OC43, etc also cause common cold, pneumonia and bronchitis //@anonymous: Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Omg here we go //@anonymous: You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
2 years ago |
Anonymous
"We the people" are much more trustable than bureaucrats //@Anonymous: And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
2 years ago |
Anonymous
And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It will show positive if a person is infectious, ie there are enough virus in the body to infect others. Person is just infected and virus is cooking inside, there may not be enough antigen to show up. But PCR will. This test will help a person to know if he/she is infectious and stop spreading.
Magic ball person, quit your useless comments.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I GUESS EVERYONE HERE ARE SCIENTISTS OR EXPERTS. MAYBE WE DONT NEED MED SCHOOL ANYMORE
2 years ago |
Anonymous
OOS
2 years ago |
Anonymous
who would want a chromebook //@anonymous: Buy Chromebook for this price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
the fact that it is apple //@anonymous: What is magic about it?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It's magic because your iPad seems feel like it's floating in the air. It's so comfortable to use and the scissor-type key lifters are a pleasure to type on. Did I also mention that you get one additional USB-C port to charge? These things are so cleverly designed that it deserves to be $300. It takes your mobile computing experience to the next level and it adds protection like no other!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The magic of making profit with Apple brand //@anonymous: What is magic about it?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The price tag //@anonymous: What is magic about it?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Damn.... I just bought it on Verizon two days ago bundling with other stuff I don't really needed. I should have waited for this. This is a better deal. //@anonymous: Amazing deal!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Lol good one //@anonymous: What is magic about it?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Buy Chromebook for this price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
What is magic about it?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Amazing deal!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The price is $271 now.
3 months ago |
Anonymous
Its a deal because everyone is jumping on 4K already. Just spent the money on a 4K your eyes will thank you. You can switch the 4K display to QHD when you want to game best of both world. Its a little money because everyone online rate this screen a 6/10.
4 months ago |
Anonymous
Excellent spec for such small money.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
Great price for the specs. Of course you can always find better specs and sizes but be prepared to pay a lot more. Costco has a similar one for $230 (sale).
1 year ago |
Anonymous
For gaming, VA panel is better. //@Anonymous: VA panel, not IPS
1 year ago |
Anonymous
VA panel, not IPS
1 year ago |
Anonymous
These 32 inch lg panels are underrated. Nice contrast, blacks, viewing angles.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
yes of course it does! //@Anonymous: Does it work with nvidia graphics card RTX 20xx ?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Does it work with nvidia graphics card RTX 20xx ?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Not 4K
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I need one with built in speaker too. This has no speaker
2 years ago |
RoshDrozzley
It's a very good deal! I got a plain 32" QHD 70hz for $199 a few months ago and that was a good deal. $50 extra for 165hz is amazing //@anonymous: Is it a good deal? Thanks!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Is it a good deal? Thanks!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Do I become a noble writer from using this?
6 days ago |