Anonymous
House of the rising sun
1 week ago |
Anonymous
800 after tax, you get 128GB storage
6 months ago |
cheetah
Updated, thanks! //@anonymous: Is 15.6"
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Is 15.6"
2 years ago |
Anonymous
sweet deal. Is it targeted //@Anonymous: Nice, as a prime member, I got $20 prime discount, and there is an $75 amazon gift card as well. Plan to buy "just dance" for VR exercising!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Nice, as a prime member, I got $20 prime discount, and there is an $75 amazon gift card as well. Plan to buy "just dance" for VR exercising!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I have selected chase promotion. Used 1 point and got $15 off. Final price $144 +tax.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Saved a trip to Sam’s and saved gas plus 98 cents lol. //@anonymous: Got one @$149 /free shipping, thanks! //@anonymous: If you “wowfresh” for Walmart, that’s another $10 off.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
wowfresh is not working... asking to add items worth $50 more. //@anonymous: If you “wowfresh” for Walmart, that’s another $10 off.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
B&H is $240, not $199.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Wallymart: $214.99 as of 1/21/2023
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Walmart is still in stock..just bought.. price 129
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Actually, there’s 3 versions of AirPods Pro (1G, 1G w/ MagSafe, and 2G). //@anonymous: Only if you live in the future. Pro only has 2 versions so far //@anonymous: Is this 3rd generation?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Only if you live in the future. Pro only has 2 versions so far //@anonymous: Is this 3rd generation?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
You need two, one for each ear, for NC to work correctly. //@anonymous: I bought one and it is not so good. I kept hearing noise disturbance.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I bought one and it is not so good. I kept hearing noise disturbance.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this 3rd generation?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
No where does it say it is 2nd Gen. What is the point you’re trying to make? //@anonymous: This is the old generation. Not the new one.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
This is the old generation. Not the new one.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
this is not 2nd gen airpod pro
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Not sometimes. You just don’t understand sales vs markdowns. This is not food going past its expiry date. //@anonymous: Because APP 2 are being sold at 259, APP 1 at 165 seems like a steal, even though BF 2021 had it for 165 … that’s just Costco messing with our minds … hey mama, look old shiny object is $100 cheaper … whoa
I in fact bought for 165 in Costco on BF 2021… //@anonymous: I don’t understand sales sometimes, they were 165 at Costco on Thanksgiving 2021 and now even AirPods Pro 2 will be released, it’s up at 199…
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Because APP 2 are being sold at 259, APP 1 at 165 seems like a steal, even though BF 2021 had it for 165 … that’s just Costco messing with our minds … hey mama, look old shiny object is $100 cheaper … whoa
I in fact bought for 165 in Costco on BF 2021… //@anonymous: I don’t understand sales sometimes, they were 165 at Costco on Thanksgiving 2021 and now even AirPods Pro 2 will be released, it’s up at 199…
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Should I wait for Black Friday ….
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I don’t understand sales sometimes, they were 165 at Costco on Thanksgiving 2021 and now even AirPods Pro 2 will be released, it’s up at 199…
4 years ago |
Anonymous
pro is 199 at costco. 3rd gen is 169.99
4 years ago |
Anonymous
The price in Sam's Club is $169.99 too.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
REALLY AWESOME!!
4 years ago |
deal_hunter
$169.99 at Costco
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Bought one, price will be back to $199 soon, like yesterday.
4 years ago |
Harry
Updated, thank you. //@anonymous: 175 at costco
4 years ago |
Anonymous
175 at costco
4 years ago |
cheetah
updated, thanks! //@deal_hunter: $175 at Target.com
4 years ago |
deal_hunter
$175 at Target.com
4 years ago |
mutongo
Updated, thanks. //@anonymous: Sam's is $197 now
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Do you really believe Apple will sell better hardware at lower price LOL //@Anonymous: Apple TV is better and surprisingly cheaper.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Thiss is top of the line Android TV box. I had 2017 version and this remote works much better.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Yeah, I agree. Apple is better. //@Anonymous: Do you really believe Apple will sell better hardware at lower price LOL //@Anonymous: Apple TV is better and surprisingly cheaper.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
This is the new version not old one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Do you really believe Apple will sell better hardware at lower price LOL //@Anonymous: Apple TV is better and surprisingly cheaper.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Different remotes and the 2019 edition has AI upscaling //@Anonymous: How do I know if its 2017 VS 2020? //@Anonymous: 2017 edition, not the new one
6 years ago |
Anonymous
How do I know if its 2017 VS 2020? //@Anonymous: 2017 edition, not the new one
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Depends on what features you are after. The Nvidia Shield remains the only streaming box on the market which can handle direct audio passthrough of both DTS:X and Dolby Atmos audio streams. 2019 version also features AI enhanced upscaling. //@Anonymous: Apple TV is better and surprisingly cheaper.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Apple TV is better and surprisingly cheaper.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
It's listed as 'Getting more soon'. Same price on Nvidia's website...and same availability.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
2017 edition, not the new one
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Instead of this junk u can buy samsung A9 11inch 64gb for $139 //@anonymous: Good, I don't have to Pay Apple Tax.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Good, I don't have to Pay Apple Tax.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Works for me. It's a cheap but reliable tablet. What do you expect? //@Anonymous: Screen resolution: 720p
2 years ago |
Anonymous
great for kids or who can't tell what 1080p looks like //@Anonymous: Screen resolution: 720p
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Nice! //@anonymous: Screen resolution: 720p
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Screen resolution: 720p
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I'm sure these are in high demand these days.
12 months ago |
Anonymous
Just ordered now //@anonymous: Oos
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Oos
4 years ago |
Anonymous
This is my experience as well. I used these to test my kid twice and the results came out negative. The next day he did a PCR test it was positive. //@anonymous: Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
No. WalMart agreed to 180 days of fixed cost to sell these. Now they said they need to make profit on it for logistical purposes. I listened to the earning call. They are scammers. //@anonymous: Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, it looks like it. But I think the $14 was discounted cause I found it selling for $24+ at a local CVS //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
The one I got from CVS says made in China //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Showed as available for store pickup. Just got the cancellation email. Walmart inventory system and customer service is really bad. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Harry
According to the Q&A on Amazon's product page, yes they are made in the USA. //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
If one believes the study (which one should), then let’s understand and believe it in it’s entirety. The study says that SENSITIVITY of BINAX NOW tests is HIGH.
Specifically, the SENSITIVITY when compared to a culture test (where virus is grown from the sample and is a much better but more time-consuming than even RT-PCR test) was HIGH (> 70%) and the Positive and Negative PREDICTIVE values were high (ie test is valuable - 100%, 92.7% respectively) even for asymptomatic cases INCLUDING for those that developed symptoms within 7 days of testing.
See “ For participants who were within 7 days of symptom onset, the BinaxNOW antigen test sensitivity was 71.1% (95% CI = 63.0%–78.4%), specificity was 100% (95% CI = 99.3%–100%), PPV was 100% (95% CI = 96.4%–100%), and NPV was 92.7% (95% CI = 90.2%–94.7%).”
The paper further advocates use of serial testing to tighten above based on additional factors - eg negative tests in high-risk environments should be confirmed with serial / confirmatory tests. It also recommends continued use of precautions as far as possible - distancing, masking, isolation even for those testing negative to mitigate personal and community transmission risk.
The tests are valuable when access to more accurate tests is challenged (like now) due to many reasons including stress on more accurate lab testing personnel and equipment. //@anonymous: You should READ the study, specifically the CDC one. In that study one of the things they test is is people who TESTED POSITIVE from the PCR test (which they confirmed with a second), and this kit STILL returned false negatives. And as I quoted directly, terrible sensitivity especially for asympomatic cases. So to summarize, even people whom we KNOW to have the virus, STILL tested falsely using these test kits. //@Anonymous: It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's a scam. 4 negatives but my pcr result came out positive. any confusion caused by this fake test kit makes it worse than not having it.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy. //@anonymous: Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
That's right, HCov-229E, HCov-OC43, etc also cause common cold, pneumonia and bronchitis //@anonymous: Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Omg here we go //@anonymous: You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
"We the people" are much more trustable than bureaucrats //@Anonymous: And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
4 years ago |
Anonymous
And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It will show positive if a person is infectious, ie there are enough virus in the body to infect others. Person is just infected and virus is cooking inside, there may not be enough antigen to show up. But PCR will. This test will help a person to know if he/she is infectious and stop spreading.
Magic ball person, quit your useless comments.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I GUESS EVERYONE HERE ARE SCIENTISTS OR EXPERTS. MAYBE WE DONT NEED MED SCHOOL ANYMORE
4 years ago |
Anonymous
She knows you need the disk version. Smart lady. Father's day is comming up. //@anonymous: wife doesn't let me by =(
1 year ago |
Anonymous
wife doesn't let me by =(
1 year ago |
Anonymous
And beside keyboard and mouse it also has camera and built in mic. So you don't need peripherals to have a video call. //@anonymous: Just curious, the Mac mini same spec comes to 550$ is the monitor portion worth the extra $1,000? I meant if you buy a decent external monitor would it suffice the experience?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
iMac also includes keyboard and mouse. But for me I don't think the screen itself worth the difference in price. //@anonymous: Just curious, the Mac mini same spec comes to 550$ is the monitor portion worth the extra $1,000? I meant if you buy a decent external monitor would it suffice the experience?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Just curious, the Mac mini same spec comes to 550$ is the monitor portion worth the extra $1,000? I meant if you buy a decent external monitor would it suffice the experience?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
storage will be filled up in seconds
1 year ago |