Anonymous
All in
3 years ago |
Anonymous
A deal if it is $200
5 months ago |
Anonymous
i bought 27inch for almost 8 years back. still its awesome. very nice monitor. that time i bought in best buy for $100. //@Anonymous: Broke after 1 year ????
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Broke after 1 year ????
4 years ago |
Anonymous
MSRP is $119. The pandemic is overall. It’s a budget but flimsy monitor but definitely beat any competition at $119. However, anything >= $119 is no deal.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Regular price was $119, then $129, $134, and now $145 and call it a deal? Go back to $109 and we got a deal for HP’s lowest priced monitor.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
remember, FHD = Full HD = its only 1080p.
and yes for 27', highly recommend 1440 or 2160 (4K). the price wasn't much different. Go do your research for 1440. you wont regret it to upgrade to UHD (1440) instead of just stick to FHD (1080p) cuz its cheap. If you use the monitor on daily basis, invest better ones. Long usage help your eyes as well.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
$197 now
5 years ago |
Anonymous
1080 is good for up to 24”, it’s horrible for 27” unless you never read text on the monitor. You need at least 1440 QHD on 27. //@anonymous: Bestbuy has 27inch for the same price //@Anonymous: Good deal?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
I would recommend 24 than 27 for a 1080P monitor //@Anonymous: Bestbuy has 27inch for the same price //@Anonymous: Good deal?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Bestbuy has 27inch for the same price //@Anonymous: Good deal?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Good deal?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
The price is for the 512GB and not 1TB at the B&H site.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
wow back to launch price. //@anonymous: Why you gotta fat shame my xbox
8 months ago |
Anonymous
Why you gotta fat shame my xbox
9 months ago |
Anonymous
The RFID has a serialized counter so when the roll is out of labels it stops working - every label that is printed decreases the RFID tag total
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Can you cut the RFID tag out of one roll and stick it into a generic roll? //@Anonymous: This one is not good. They put rfid chips in the label rolls and you have to use the expensive labels
3 years ago |
Anonymous
This one is not good. They put rfid chips in the label rolls and you have to use the expensive labels
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Came back two years later to say this? Go ahead and show the UHD price else you sound like a fool. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
lol FHD for $79.98??? better get UHD for same price.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Officedepot/officemax has se2722h for 89.99, a much better deal.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Instead of scoffing and laughing about FHD monitor prices how about showing where you can get a better FHD monitor for the same price? Pointless to say it’s not worth it otherwise. //@anonymous: lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
lol FHD for $165??? better get UHD for same price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Costco has a samsung 27 inch curved for 149. I think that is a pretty good price.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
There is another reason: US dollars become cheaper.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Technology always advance at steady speed because of competition. With trade war and covid, sellers no longer competing. They can still jack up the price on ancient monitors instead of slashing prices. While they can make good money on these junks, there is no need to create new products. You knew nothing about technology so I don’t know how much longer you can stay in this business. //@anonymous: What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
What are you talking about? None of what you said makes any sense coming from someone that has global supplier and manufacturing industry experience. What you feel a price should be doesn’t mean any other higher price is price gouging. //@anonymous: I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I bought 2 of these for $109 a while back. Trade war and covid are stalling competition and setting technology backwards. If it wasn’t for trade war and covid, this monitor would be sold for $79 nowadays and much better monitors would be available for $119. Now is too easy for manufacturers to make money with junks like this so there’s no need to compete or innovate.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
What should a current year model cost then? Y so suspicious //@anonymous: Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Y this is very costly for 24inch monitor.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I'm sure these are in high demand these days.
11 months ago |
Anonymous
Just ordered now //@anonymous: Oos
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Oos
4 years ago |
Anonymous
This is my experience as well. I used these to test my kid twice and the results came out negative. The next day he did a PCR test it was positive. //@anonymous: Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
No. WalMart agreed to 180 days of fixed cost to sell these. Now they said they need to make profit on it for logistical purposes. I listened to the earning call. They are scammers. //@anonymous: Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yeah, that's because the gov. Contract with wally world and Kroger has ended which paid a portion of tht tests //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, it looks like it. But I think the $14 was discounted cause I found it selling for $24+ at a local CVS //@anonymous: Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Has the price increased from $14?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
The one I got from CVS says made in China //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Showed as available for store pickup. Just got the cancellation email. Walmart inventory system and customer service is really bad. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Harry
According to the Q&A on Amazon's product page, yes they are made in the USA. //@anonymous: Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this kit made in the USA?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
If one believes the study (which one should), then let’s understand and believe it in it’s entirety. The study says that SENSITIVITY of BINAX NOW tests is HIGH.
Specifically, the SENSITIVITY when compared to a culture test (where virus is grown from the sample and is a much better but more time-consuming than even RT-PCR test) was HIGH (> 70%) and the Positive and Negative PREDICTIVE values were high (ie test is valuable - 100%, 92.7% respectively) even for asymptomatic cases INCLUDING for those that developed symptoms within 7 days of testing.
See “ For participants who were within 7 days of symptom onset, the BinaxNOW antigen test sensitivity was 71.1% (95% CI = 63.0%–78.4%), specificity was 100% (95% CI = 99.3%–100%), PPV was 100% (95% CI = 96.4%–100%), and NPV was 92.7% (95% CI = 90.2%–94.7%).”
The paper further advocates use of serial testing to tighten above based on additional factors - eg negative tests in high-risk environments should be confirmed with serial / confirmatory tests. It also recommends continued use of precautions as far as possible - distancing, masking, isolation even for those testing negative to mitigate personal and community transmission risk.
The tests are valuable when access to more accurate tests is challenged (like now) due to many reasons including stress on more accurate lab testing personnel and equipment. //@anonymous: You should READ the study, specifically the CDC one. In that study one of the things they test is is people who TESTED POSITIVE from the PCR test (which they confirmed with a second), and this kit STILL returned false negatives. And as I quoted directly, terrible sensitivity especially for asympomatic cases. So to summarize, even people whom we KNOW to have the virus, STILL tested falsely using these test kits. //@Anonymous: It's just a test, people. To HELP people...the helpful people and the unhelpful people. It's to help you know if it is covid or just a cold while you're home...before you drive to get a pcr test to confirm it. Before you walk around pretending it is just a cold, spreading covid to everyone else. My family used the tests and they were 100% accurate, as confirmed by pcr tests. It is as simple as following directions. Perhaps too complicated for the magic 8 ball guy.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It's a scam. 4 negatives but my pcr result came out positive. any confusion caused by this fake test kit makes it worse than not having it.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Our school district is giving these for free. But it is completely useless with such an accuracy. //@anonymous: Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Look like it's actually worse than a Magic 8-Ball. //@anonymous: This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
This test kit was constantly out of stock up until the FDA announced yesterday that they're only about 50% effective in detecting Omicron! And now all of a sudden they become available! How cool is that!
With 50% chance of telling me the right result I might as well throw a coin, that's 50% too! It will give me the result in a second and I save $14!!!
4 years ago |
Anonymous
That's right, HCov-229E, HCov-OC43, etc also cause common cold, pneumonia and bronchitis //@anonymous: Common cold and flu are also caused by coronavirus, which are close family to Sars-Cov2. Many mutations in new Omicron variant actually exist in common cold and flu coronaviruses. //@anonymous: Uh, these at home tests generate a 15% false negative rates and 1 to 2% false positive rates. Did you try to use that empty space between your ears before posting? //@anonymous: And the trailer park chimes in //@anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Omg here we go //@anonymous: You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
You mean political science? //@anonymous: There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
There is at least science behind this. I would not gable with my and others life with a stupid 8-ball. I believe in science. //@Anonymous: Might as well buy a Magic 8-Ball
4 years ago |
Anonymous
"We the people" are much more trustable than bureaucrats //@Anonymous: And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
4 years ago |
Anonymous
And you probably believed them. //@anonymous: On social media, many people showed positive results after testing using orange peel or other things
4 years ago |
Anonymous
It will show positive if a person is infectious, ie there are enough virus in the body to infect others. Person is just infected and virus is cooking inside, there may not be enough antigen to show up. But PCR will. This test will help a person to know if he/she is infectious and stop spreading.
Magic ball person, quit your useless comments.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I GUESS EVERYONE HERE ARE SCIENTISTS OR EXPERTS. MAYBE WE DONT NEED MED SCHOOL ANYMORE
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Thanka you //@Anonymous: Thanks !
3 days ago |
Anonymous
Thanks !
4 days ago |
$45.50 $100 Value
Dark Spot Duo Set
$49 $111 Value
Hydrate & Help Protect Gift Set
$69 $153 Value
Age-Less Experts Set
$35 $79 Value
Face & Eye Hydration Set
$56.70 $111 Value
Hydration Refillery Set
$38.50 $80 Value
Gentleman Collection Set
Anonymous
bought mine like 10 years ago about the same price //@Anonymous: good deal?
9 months ago |
Anonymous
was it the Woot refurb one? //@Anonymous: not good, I got a color all-in-one, much newer model at $179 //@Anonymous: good deal?
9 months ago |
Anonymous
not good, I got a color all-in-one, much newer model at $179 //@Anonymous: good deal?
9 months ago |
Anonymous
canons are no good
1 year ago |
Anonymous
good deal?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Agreed! //@Anonymous: dont buy always ad pop up u cant stop that anywhere its just marketing device not a person use device.
10 months ago |
Anonymous
dont buy always ad pop up u cant stop that anywhere its just marketing device not a person use device.
11 months ago |
cloiser
Prices go up because consumers tolerate.
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Should class-suit them for price gouging! //@Anonymous: apple raised macbook prices 200-300+ due to memory shortage //@Anonymous: Amazon was selling it at $849 about 2-3 weeks before
1 month ago |
Anonymous
apple raised macbook prices 200-300+ due to memory shortage //@Anonymous: Amazon was selling it at $849 about 2-3 weeks before
1 month ago |
Anonymous
you sure same model? according to CCC 900 is the lowest //@Anonymous: Amazon was selling it at $849 about 2-3 weeks before
3 months ago |
Anonymous
Amazon was selling it at $849 about 2-3 weeks before
3 months ago |
Anonymous
thats just regular price
1 month ago |
Anonymous
mutongo this listing is incorrect. None of the links have $689 price for 512gb memory. They have this price for 256fb which normal price. Can you check this please?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
How come it only has 8g memory? My 10-year old MacBook Air came with 8g!
1 month ago |
Anonymous
Do not buy HP, they will lock your printer and force you to replace the cartridge
2 months ago |
Anonymous
The included cartridges are samples to promote their subscription service. You are supposed to buy the chipless version yourself seperately. //@anonymous: The printer itself is OK, but this model uses expensive ink cartridges that have microchips to prevent you from refilling with generic ink.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
You almost have to subscribe to their EZ print refresh service for this printer as it makes more sense from the cost perspective, although for occasional prints it is not bad at all ($2.50 per month for 40 pages).
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Thanks for sharing the information, almost pull the trigger
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The printer itself is OK, but this model uses expensive ink cartridges that have microchips to prevent you from refilling with generic ink.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Is it noticeable you think? //@anonymous: 60Hz
2 months ago |
Anonymous
60Hz
10 months ago |
Anonymous
VA panel
10 months ago |
Anonymous
Prime members only
1 year ago |