That's true. 120Hz is better on motion blur. However considering the extra cost it might not be that cost-effective, as most people don't quite care about it, especially those who buy these cheap TVs. //@Anonymous: 120 vs 60 frames are huge different, you won't know til you see and actually can tell
|
By anonymous on 09/17/2018, 05:58 PM EDT
120 vs 60 frames are huge different, you won't know til you see and actually can tell
|
By anonymous on 09/01/2018, 12:23 AM EDT
no brain statement. //@Anonymous: It is just a fact, why so mean. //@Anonymous: $300 for a 55inch HDTV and you complained about refresh rate and features? This thing even includes chrome cast. Get a life.
|
By anonymous on 09/01/2018, 12:01 AM EDT
It is just a fact, why so mean. //@Anonymous: $300 for a 55inch HDTV and you complained about refresh rate and features? This thing even includes chrome cast. Get a life.
|
By anonymous on 08/31/2018, 05:42 PM EDT
$300 for a 55inch HDTV and you complained about refresh rate and features? This thing even includes chrome cast. Get a life.
|
By anonymous on 08/31/2018, 04:40 PM EDT
for $300 what are the things you need from a TV. you are talking about all 120 an 60 Hz crap. fua //@Anonymous: though page says 120hz, actually, no, box says 60hz
|
By anonymous on 08/31/2018, 04:32 PM EDT
though page says 120hz, actually, no, box says 60hz
|