« Previous | 81 to 90 of 13170 | Next » |
Anonymous
not RTX 3060
3 years ago |
mutongo
Updated, thanks. //@anonymous: not RTX 3060
3 years ago |
raymondlei
It’s RTX 3060 based on description on HP //@anonymous: not RTX 3060
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I am surprised this doesn't cost more like $500 or $600, if not more! The innovative, cutting edge technology packed into this watch is astounding.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
ESG, Blood Oxygen, and body temporary Sensor //@Anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
The screen is the main different. //@Anonymous: ESG, Blood Oxygen, and body temporary Sensor //@Anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
None is going to give you a comprehensive answer. Go to apple.com and compare both models, comeback here and answer your own question. //@anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Oh please. Apple increased the volume of production to satisfy their loyal fans. They felt bad knowing that some people couldn’t buy them at first release on previous years. //@anonymous: In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
FYI, Corporate America doesn't care about how you feel. //@Anonymous: Oh please. Apple increased the volume of production to satisfy their loyal fans. They felt bad knowing that some people couldn’t buy them at first release on previous years. //@anonymous: In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Correct. They only care about the stock owners //@anonymous: FYI, Corporate America doesn't care about how you feel. //@Anonymous: Oh please. Apple increased the volume of production to satisfy their loyal fans. They felt bad knowing that some people couldn’t buy them at first release on previous years. //@anonymous: In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
FYI, that poster was obviously joking. Woosh. //@anonymous: FYI, Corporate America doesn't care about how you feel. //@Anonymous: Oh please. Apple increased the volume of production to satisfy their loyal fans. They felt bad knowing that some people couldn’t buy them at first release on previous years. //@anonymous: In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I am surprised this doesn't cost more like $500 or $600, if not more! The innovative, cutting edge technology packed into this watch is astounding.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
it will, the msrp is $299 back in series 3 or 4 //@Anonymous: I am surprised this doesn't cost more like $500 or $600, if not more! The innovative, cutting edge technology packed into this watch is astounding.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The watch ultra costs $700+. //@Anonymous: I am surprised this doesn't cost more like $500 or $600, if not more! The innovative, cutting edge technology packed into this watch is astounding.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Best price since it's release. Not
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Best price since it's release. Too bad the ultra price is almost double this.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Walmart ha watch 7 with cellular fir 329$ that’s better if you are not to keen on body temperature and crash detection
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Walmart has series 7 cellular for 250 or 279. If green color works for you
2 years ago |
Anonymous
A friend of mine dropped his Apple Watch on the floor and it didn’t break. These things are built so tough! Amazing!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
impressive! //@anonymous: A friend of mine dropped his Apple Watch on the floor and it didn’t break. These things are built so tough! Amazing!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Wow this is a seriously sturdy watch! //@anonymous: A friend of mine dropped his Apple Watch on the floor and it didn’t break. These things are built so tough! Amazing!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Is this comment real? Are you a bot? //@anonymous: I am surprised this doesn't cost more like $500 or $600, if not more! The innovative, cutting edge technology packed into this watch is astounding.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
SE has less features and doesn't have stay-on wake technology //@Anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
If you are considering on need basis, SE is all the thing that you need and more. Apple watch 7 and 8 has some of the things that you would never use. //@Anonymous: SE has less features and doesn't have stay-on wake technology //@Anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
People are running out of arms to wear Apple watches. //@anonymous: In previous years, Apple watch used to sold out in few hours of sale. Now its more than 2 days and large quantities are still in stock. No one is buying this junk anymore. Recession is coming.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I think blood oxygen level is still a vital upgrade. But you'd pay 150 for that. //@Anonymous: If you are considering on need basis, SE is all the thing that you need and more. Apple watch 7 and 8 has some of the things that you would never use. //@Anonymous: SE has less features and doesn't have stay-on wake technology //@Anonymous: what is the difference between this one and the SE? Se is $150 cheaper, why?
2 years ago |
testyy4
right now
2 years ago |
Anonymous
It was $129 at target after coupon during last Thanksgiving. In many other stores it was $153.99. And deal lasted long time.
8 months ago |
Anonymous
7 years later, this mf: APPLE REINVENTED FOLDING TECHNOLOGY!!! //@anonymous: Apple reinvented USB-C //@anonymous: Now apple is forced to add USB-C, thats the only difference //@Anonymous: is there any improvement on this 2nd generation airpod pro? I thought it has been on the market for quit a while.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) was announced on September 23 2023. How can you use them for a year already? //@anonymous: why do you want to mislead people. these are great for running. I wear them for running everyday for a year now. never had problems. //@Anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
is there any improvement on this 2nd generation airpod pro? I thought it has been on the market for quit a while.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Now apple is forced to add USB-C, thats the only difference //@Anonymous: is there any improvement on this 2nd generation airpod pro? I thought it has been on the market for quit a while.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
it's been this price almost all the time
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Apple reinvented USB-C //@anonymous: Now apple is forced to add USB-C, thats the only difference //@Anonymous: is there any improvement on this 2nd generation airpod pro? I thought it has been on the market for quit a while.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
This USB-C cord is way too easy to be malfunctioned. Just replaced a new cord at Apple Store after 2 and half months use until it stopped charging.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
So they replaced it? What’s the problem then? //@anonymous: This USB-C cord is way too easy to be malfunctioned. Just replaced a new cord at Apple Store after 2 and half months use until it stopped charging.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
7 years later, this mf: APPLE REINVENTED FOLDING TECHNOLOGY!!! //@anonymous: Apple reinvented USB-C //@anonymous: Now apple is forced to add USB-C, thats the only difference //@Anonymous: is there any improvement on this 2nd generation airpod pro? I thought it has been on the market for quit a while.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Costco has the same price as Amazon expired 11/2/23
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Not only did Apple do a great job fixing the USB-C mess, but they quietly invented folding technology and generously let other manufacturers use it.
1 year ago |
username
Target also had them at $189. Just bought some today.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
In for one at best buy, free one-day shipping, local store, no complaints.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
wait for $149
1 year ago |
Anonymous
It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Target is priced at $249 not $189.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Oh please. Stop making things up. //@anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
He's kinda right, but the actual alternative is Shokz Open Run pro which has prolonged battery life and does not weaken your awareness during the workout, especially if you are a runner. //@Anonymous: Oh please. Stop making things up. //@anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Haha - what foolishness (but kinda funny) //@anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
why do you want to mislead people. these are great for running. I wear them for running everyday for a year now. never had problems. //@Anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Apple AirPods Pro (2nd Gen, USB-C) was announced on September 23 2023. How can you use them for a year already? //@anonymous: why do you want to mislead people. these are great for running. I wear them for running everyday for a year now. never had problems. //@Anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
These have had so many issues compared to my gen 1s. I wish they would fix them already
1 year ago |
Anonymous
This is by far the best $179.99 I've ever spent!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Tax-free? Wow //@anonymous: This is by far the best $179.99 I've ever spent!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
The best deal is Costco. It includes AppleCare+.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Fanboys make up your mind!
1 year ago |
Anonymous
R u saying 1 size fit all? Think b4 saying //@anonymous: why do you want to mislead people. these are great for running. I wear them for running everyday for a year now. never had problems. //@Anonymous: It is not suitable for exercising. It got high-pitched sounds caused deaf if it touched your sweat or water. Get Beats Fit Pro is better.
11 months ago |
Anonymous
76 only
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Was 60 before the pandemic
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I think you missed the point. I wasn’t saying anything about any one else’s comment except yours. Calling out prices from 3+ years ago is nonsense. Makes zero difference. Change your focus, you might see something nice. //@anonymous: The first response was not me. Apparently I did not think it was a good price, which is why I gave the cheaper price before the pandemic. You really need to improve your logic skills. //@Anonymous: Strange way of saying you think it’s a good price. //@anonymous: Was 60 before the pandemic
2 years ago |
« Previous | 81 to 90 of 13170 | Next » |
Anonymous
Am I the only one feels these are expensive? Even for an adult?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
have thetree house .. not good .. pieces keep falling off
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Am I the only one feels these are expensive? Even for an adult?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Or maybe this much money I can build a real treehouse? I (my kids) love Legos but some of these sets are way too expensive. //@Anonymous: Am I the only one feels these are expensive? Even for an adult?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
no they are expensive =/ feel the price has gotten worse last few years too //@Anonymous: Or maybe this much money I can build a real treehouse? I (my kids) love Legos but some of these sets are way too expensive. //@Anonymous: Am I the only one feels these are expensive? Even for an adult?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
The price in walmart is $239
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yes, it has gotten more expensive but they continue to be popular. With the pandemic, more people are at home so this is something that they can do with their kids (or even for their own sanity). Supply and demand. Wishing for it to be cheaper wouldn't make a difference. //@Anonymous: no they are expensive =/ feel the price has gotten worse last few years too //@Anonymous: Or maybe this much money I can build a real treehouse? I (my kids) love Legos but some of these sets are way too expensive. //@Anonymous: Am I the only one feels these are expensive? Even for an adult?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
We own this set, and it is amazing in both construction and detail. Many LEGO sets cost around 10 cents per piece… this set is now around half that cost. Absolutely a deal.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Buying this kit to build tree house, worthless. Building this tree house with basic Lego pieces, priceless.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
I would rather prefer the lego space shuttle, which is at the same price of the tree house.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
If it is impossible to achieve in reality, it is also good to achieve it in another way.
3 years ago |