| « Previous | 7151 to 7160 of 8192 | Next » |
Anonymous
Hot deal
7 years ago |
Anonymous
390, can't be any more
7 years ago |
Anonymous
no webcam //@Anonymous: 390, can't be any more
7 years ago |
Anonymous
380 a few times when ebay has 15% off
7 years ago |
| « Previous | 7151 to 7160 of 8192 | Next » |
Anonymous
the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Oops....
I did not know that people are still using walkman
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Now you do! Welcome to 2018! //@anonymous: Oops....
I did not know that people are still using walkman
7 years ago |
Anonymous
All in..lol
7 years ago |
Anonymous
is this what is meant by "retro tech"?
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Why a mp3 is so expensive? Anything special?
7 years ago |
Anonymous
the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
it will be sold with youtube streaming function
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Thank you oh great audiophile for even recognizing that such lowly commoners exist. We hope that the sound quality is to your liking, up there in the clouds. //@anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Ah for people who can’t afford an iPhone lol
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Old do not use WE cause u speak not even for yourself //@anonymous: Thank you oh great audiophile for even recognizing that such lowly commoners exist. We hope that the sound quality is to your liking, up there in the clouds. //@anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Not really it depends what headphone you are using with it. //@Anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
lol, you are so wrong. don't event know where to start. //@Anonymous: Not really it depends what headphone you are using with it. //@Anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
This is just a Walkman, the selling point is its capability of playing lossless audio (I guess). But it relies on good headphones. Portable device designed for audiophile is sort of joke basically
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Why do you use your f@ke votes for that comment? Feeling insecure tonight? //@Anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Abt same price no shipping/tax
https://www.abt.com/product/120169/Sony-16GB-Grayish-Black-Walkman-MP3-Player-NWA45B.html
7 years ago |
Anonymous
$198 @ at BH Photos
7 years ago |
Anonymous
16 gb memory is too meager for this price
7 years ago |
Anonymous
This one is not that good. It is alright. I wanted to buy one and went to bestbuy to test it out. I will just stay with my phone untill I can afford NW-WM1A
7 years ago |
Anonymous
And you need .flac music too. //@Anonymous: Not really it depends what headphone you are using with it. //@Anonymous: the sound quality is superior. for those who has picky ears this is a good choice. but most people would just use iPhone to play poor quality music.
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Lol! Walkman... Seriously?!!
7 years ago |
Anonymous
Fiio X3 is better and cheaper than this.
7 years ago |