Anonymous

Is “ Lenovo IdeaPad 1 14" Laptop: AMD A6-Series, 4GB Memory, 64GB eMMC” a good deal?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

too bad , no good brand laptop, HP has serious quality issues and cheap materials there years.

5 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

There are always laptop deals...check back next week.

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

No, poor quality, had a Lenovo 3 years ago, malfunctioned in a year, had to buy another brand instead. //@Anonymous: Is “ Lenovo IdeaPad 1 14" Laptop: AMD A6-Series, 4GB Memory, 64GB eMMC” a good deal?

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

In general... no the Lenovo IdeaPad 14" laptop with 4gb of memory and 64GB eMMC is not a good deal. The only reason I could see someone buying that is if they're only going to use it for browsing the internet and checking email. 64gb is not enough room for Windows 10 so they had to install a smaller version of the operating system on it. I'd suggest getting a laptop that has 8gb of ram and 256gb of storage space, at the very least. //@Anonymous: Is “ Lenovo IdeaPad 1 14" Laptop: AMD A6-Series, 4GB Memory, 64GB eMMC” a good deal?

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

justdidit

HP is much more reliable than seemingly expensive-looking heavy Dell and much cheaper. //@Anonymous: too bad , no good brand laptop, HP has serious quality issues and cheap materials there years.

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

don't agree. I would never buy an HP again //@justdidit: HP is much more reliable than seemingly expensive-looking heavy Dell and much cheaper. //@Anonymous: too bad , no good brand laptop, HP has serious quality issues and cheap materials there years.

5 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

HP is the worst period

5 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Dell is worst

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Sony is $899, not $799?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Le'NO'vo

5 years ago Up 7 | Reply

Anonymous

lenovo 27" is $400, not $199

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Harry

Updated, thank you. //@anonymous: lenovo 27" is $400, not $199

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

$399 has been a pretty common price recently.

Anyone have experience with this and want to share?

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Great product //@anonymous: $399 has been a pretty common price recently.

Anyone have experience with this and want to share?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Sometimes Costco is cheaper when it is on sale.

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

how about this one vs blink xt2?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Total waste of money.. batteries last 3-5 days at most .. need to recharge one by one .. need pay subscription to USE it .. basic free plan limit most regular & advanced functionalities .. camera motion detection is bad .. records only 3 minutes after motion detections so you won't catch someone stealing something in action .. etc etc. TOTAL waste //@Anonymous: Great product //@anonymous: $399 has been a pretty common price recently.

Anyone have experience with this and want to share?

5 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

how this product comparing to google nest outdoor camera? thks

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I've had mine for 2.5 years and have no issues. mine gets triggered a few times a night and batteries last 3-4 months or more. I have a 2 different versions. One of the newer ones the battery lasts a lot less than the older model. Also, the lag on the newer model (of mine) is worse than an older one. You would think this would get better over time- not worse. Video quality is better than ring and some other cameras in my opinion. Worthwhile on a good sale. Decent product but mine is not Pro 2 version either but older. //@Anonymous: Great product //@anonymous: $399 has been a pretty common price recently.

Anyone have experience with this and want to share?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I own Arlo for 3 years now and Blink for 1.5 yrs.

Arlo sucks, Used inside the house | Battery dies faster (3 months)| Needs expensive spl battery on older models | App is slow and bad lag | I dont think its worth.

Blink is awesome, Used it outside the house | Battery lasts 9-10 months | Needs AA battery | App is good and no lag | Totally worth the money //@Anonymous: $399 has been a pretty common price recently.

Anyone have experience with this and want to share?

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

it seems mixed opinions :) i bought my system last year on thanksgiving from costco the same price as this one. they work very well to me since then. yes, they are once in a while triggered by bees, squirrels, and strong wind because of tree swinging. battery life is highly related to traffic. i charge 2 of them every 2 months.

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

i have a nest doorbell not camera and it's much better than my arlo. i would assume any nest product is better as i think they are wired and record 24/7. app is better, no lag time, no batteries, etc //@Anonymous: how this product comparing to google nest outdoor camera? thks

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

wyze is good one, Arlo is not worth that much $$$ //@Anonymous: i have a nest doorbell not camera and it's much better than my arlo. i would assume any nest product is better as i think they are wired and record 24/7. app is better, no lag time, no batteries, etc //@Anonymous: how this product comparing to google nest outdoor camera? thks

5 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

better yet! wait for Wyze cam to come out with their outdoor version which should be somewhat soon and spend 70% less.

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply