| « Previous | 401 to 410 of 62243 | Next » |
Anonymous
$339.99??
5 years ago |
Infinity
Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??
5 years ago |
Anonymous
what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
onceternal
No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
RoshDrozzley
Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
5 years ago |
Anonymous
No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.
Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.
//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
4 years ago |
Anonymous
not 120hz, sad
4 years ago |
Anonymous
I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I can see a border on that display...
10 months ago |
| « Previous | 401 to 410 of 62243 | Next » |
Anonymous
It's $1799 @ Costco.
1 year ago |
cheetah
Updated, thanks! //@anonymous: It's $1799 @ Costco.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Costco has 2nd year warranty
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I just claimed the 2nd-year warranty for my MacBook Air due to screen glitches and a black screen issue. Hoping the process goes smoothly—let’s see how it turns out. //@anonymous: Costco has 2nd year warranty
1 year ago |
Anonymous
512gb is too small.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Apple just wrote me a check $46.29 for a law suite.
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Costco's listed price is : $1799 (after $150 discount) - 05/10/2025
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Only apple official site has the nano texture display ?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
$1649.99 at Micro Center if there is one near you
11 months ago |
Anonymous
A pro machine should have 32g at least
11 months ago |
Anonymous
At Costco, the listed sale price is $1749 (11/21/2025)
8 months ago |