| « Previous | 401 to 410 of 58829 | Next » |
Anonymous
The ban was from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) //@anonymous: How can Apple get rid of its inventory if there is a ban? //@anonymous: After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
1 year ago |
Anonymous
haha apple watches banned in US. how beautiful!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
45mm is 359 not 329
2 years ago |
Anonymous
$329 for 45mm with s/m wrist band. m/l is still $359 //@anonymous: 45mm is 359 not 329
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Midnight S/M, 45mm is 329 //@anonymous: 45mm is 359 not 329
2 years ago |
Anonymous
I don't get why the prices change so much. I was able to get a midnight m/l for $329 but now $359. Crazy prices hope this is the lowest. So far better than Costco pricing.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Today is today. You can't go back in time.. //@anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Not today but maybe tomorrow //@anonymous: Today is today. You can't go back in time.. //@anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
today is tommorow's yesterday //@Anonymous: Not today but maybe tomorrow //@anonymous: Today is today. You can't go back in time.. //@anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Can Apple watch travel like a time machine? //@Anonymous: today is tommorow's yesterday //@Anonymous: Not today but maybe tomorrow //@anonymous: Today is today. You can't go back in time.. //@anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
miss that village. won't have another shop. //@Anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
If you put a apple watch in time machine, it will travel. //@Anonymous: Can Apple watch travel like a time machine? //@Anonymous: today is tommorow's yesterday //@Anonymous: Not today but maybe tomorrow //@anonymous: Today is today. You can't go back in time.. //@anonymous: Yesterday was 319
2 years ago |
Anonymous
After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
2 years ago |
Anonymous
How can Apple get rid of its inventory if there is a ban? //@anonymous: After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Ordered on 12/8, expected to arrive by 12/24, just got delayed till 12/28.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
haha apple watches banned in US. how beautiful!
2 years ago |
Anonymous
They can just dump these devices to other countries. These are not ban for any technical reason. The price in US will only go up because they will be out of stock soon. //@Anonymous: After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
2 years ago |
Anonymous
You make no sense at all //@anonymous: After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Did you get it? //@anonymous: Ordered on 12/8, expected to arrive by 12/24, just got delayed till 12/28.
2 years ago |
Anonymous
The ban was from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) //@anonymous: How can Apple get rid of its inventory if there is a ban? //@anonymous: After ban on this watch, I assume this watch will be sold with heavy discount as Apple has to get rid of inventory
1 year ago |
Anonymous
179 is gone
2 months ago |
Anonymous
The last 3 sold out just in front of my eyes!
2 months ago |
Anonymous
Got the last one yesterday. Super low stock for this.
2 months ago |
Anonymous
Why no deal on smaller sized 9 or 10?
1 month ago |
Anonymous
I can see a border on that display...
5 months ago |
Anonymous
I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
4 years ago |
Anonymous
Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.
3 years ago |
Anonymous
avoid at at cost. worked a little over a year then screen flashed and wouldn't turn on after powering off
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I had it for over 3 years and never cause any problems but upgraded to Pixel 9
1 year ago |
Anonymous
Same no problem at all,but a little bulky //@anonymous: I had it for over 3 years and never cause any problems but upgraded to Pixel 9
1 year ago |
Anonymous
there was a 30% off coupon earlier this morning
1 year ago |
Anonymous
too old. OS is v12. useless
6 months ago |
Anonymous
batter drain out fast.
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 7 Pro should be this price range. This is a junk, even not worth $150.
//@Anonymous: too old. OS is v12. useless
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 10 is about be launched soon
6 months ago |
Anonymous
Pixel 6 pro is too old. I will not consider it even if its $100.
$290 for a pixel 7 pro would be a warm deal, not a hot deal.
5 months ago |
Anonymous
What year is it now? This phone is old, and battery have shelf age!
5 months ago |
Anonymous
same but 10 is also the same price from boostmobile, all you have to do is stay with them.
4 months ago |
| « Previous | 401 to 410 of 58829 | Next » |
Anonymous
more than 50% sugar!
1 week ago |