Anonymous

Deal

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Do not buy inkjet printers. Too expensive in the long run. Go for Laser printers. You will save a lot in toners.

4 years ago Up 15 | Reply

Anonymous

Oos

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

All in

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Do not buy inkjet printers. Too expensive in the long run. Go for Laser printers. You will save a lot in toners.

4 years ago Up 15 | Reply

Anonymous

You can refill them //@anonymous: Do not buy inkjet printers. Too expensive in the long run. Go for Laser printers. You will save a lot in toners.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

jj0915

After two decades, switched from laser to inkjet because:
1. Color is always better!
2. Laser toner cartridges are not eco-friendly.
3. Inkjet cartridges can be refilled. Search Utube. I bought refillable cartridges (extra large) and they are still half full after two years. //@Anonymous: Do not buy inkjet printers. Too expensive in the long run. Go for Laser printers. You will save a lot in toners.

3 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Not true. First of all life should be in color. Secondly toner cartridges are not friendly to the environment. Thirdly new tank style inkjets are super low cost in the long run. I am still using old inkjets with refillable cartridges since 2019. I spent $30 on the inks then and still have half left. So cost of color prints for three years is $15. //@Anonymous: Do not buy inkjet printers. Too expensive in the long run. Go for Laser printers. You will save a lot in toners.

3 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Laser printer has color.

2 years ago Up 3 | Reply

carrollyon

I use inkjet now but suffering ink block every month if i didn’t use it. Have to clean it before using. Any advise?

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Check Costco - They usually have it for $399

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

$449....same price //@Anonymous: Check Costco - They usually have it for $399

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

If you carry it outside of house and lose it, you lose $449

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Don't buy it if you don't need it. I paid ~$130 for a 500G one 5 years ago. It has been collecting dust most of the time since.

2 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Is it the drive caused lawsuit?

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Yes, I think so. //@Anonymous: Is it the drive caused lawsuit?

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Better to go with a Crucial or Samsung portable SSD, this one has major issues.

2 years ago Up 8 | Reply

Anonymous

Sadly Sandisk used to be the gold standard for flash storage

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

most complaints are from 2TB version. it seem 2TB ones got lots of failures. so please check and do more research before purchasing them.

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Just because most people bought 2TB version. The control circuit has serious hardware issues, not the SSD. //@Anonymous: most complaints are from 2TB version. it seem 2TB ones got lots of failures. so please check and do more research before purchasing them.

2 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

it is a SN550 inside this E61 4TB version

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

That was before Sandisk was acquired by Western Digital //@Anonymous: Sadly Sandisk used to be the gold standard for flash storage

2 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

i bought three 4tb and two 2tb of them as a photographer, i fill them on a daily basis....2tb are dead, didnt even make it 6 months, before files went missing or corrupt. two of the 4tb developed same issues just took 9-10 months....sandisk replaced them all, and i sold the new ones they sent me. changed over to a usb-c nvme enclosure and nvme drives, no issues. //@Anonymous: Just because most people bought 2TB version. The control circuit has serious hardware issues, not the SSD. //@Anonymous: most complaints are from 2TB version. it seem 2TB ones got lots of failures. so please check and do more research before purchasing them.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Price listed for the 4TB is now: $257.80 (1/11/2024)

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply