Anonymous

It's $1799 @ Costco.

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

cheetah

Updated, thanks! //@anonymous: It's $1799 @ Costco.

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Costco has 2nd year warranty

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

I just claimed the 2nd-year warranty for my MacBook Air due to screen glitches and a black screen issue. Hoping the process goes smoothly—let’s see how it turns out. //@anonymous: Costco has 2nd year warranty

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

512gb is too small.

1 year ago Up 9 | Reply

Anonymous

Apple just wrote me a check $46.29 for a law suite.

1 year ago Up 7 | Reply

Anonymous

Costco's listed price is : $1799 (after $150 discount) - 05/10/2025

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Only apple official site has the nano texture display ?

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

$1649.99 at Micro Center if there is one near you

11 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

A pro machine should have 32g at least

11 months ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

At Costco, the listed sale price is $1749 (11/21/2025)

8 months ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

$339.99??

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Infinity

Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

onceternal

No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

RoshDrozzley

Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.

Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.

//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

not 120hz, sad

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I can see a border on that display...

10 months ago Up 0 | Reply