Anonymous

Not 2022??

1 year ago Up 8 | Reply

Anonymous

https://www.apple.com/watch/compare/?modelList=watch-se-gen1,watch-se-gen2

Yes, 2022.

1 year ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024

8 months ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

they mean 2nd gen //@Anonymous: there is no such thing as Apple Watch SE 2024

7 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I believe for the same price, you can get the Cellular on at Walmart now.

6 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.

5 months ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

I also use my iphone to find my iwatach //@anonymous: I only use my Apple watch for two things: check time and find my iphone.

4 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

any good for dyesub?

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

It was $125 last Dec.

11 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I don't see 141.99. It is showing 159.99

8 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

it shown $1897.75.

7 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

$350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 228 | Reply

Anonymous

$350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 228 | Reply

Anonymous

exactly //@Anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

don't have room for a real one //@Anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I am a huge Lego fan, but I don't get this either. //@anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

A lot of lego fans are real nuts. //@Anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

This is for real piano fan, might not lego fan. Haha

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

I like this so much, but it is way too expensive.

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

A real piano is thousands of dollars. //@anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Yes...a good grand piano can even cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, but they would probably start around 10,000 for a playable grand piano... //@anonymous: A real piano is thousands of dollars. //@anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

more expensive Lego has more collection value

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

It is a piece of arts, priceless

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

No, it’s Legos. //@anonymous: It is a piece of arts, priceless

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

great deal! much cheaper than real piano. my son is already learning to play with this one. //@Anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I read about it before it came out and thought it's really cool. Not only can you play it, you can program it through an app and let it play. I'm not interested in buying this one, however lego is good investment.. my $300 ninjago city is now worth $600 //@anonymous: $350 for a fake Piano? Why not get a real one ...

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply