« Previous | 31 to 40 of 4336 | Next » |
Anonymous
thanks
1 year ago |
Anonymous
$339.99??
3 years ago |
Infinity
Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??
3 years ago |
Anonymous
what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
onceternal
No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
Anonymous
Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 years ago |
RoshDrozzley
Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
2 years ago |
Anonymous
No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.
Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.
//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
1 year ago |
Anonymous
not 120hz, sad
1 year ago |
Anonymous
I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?
3 weeks ago |
« Previous | 31 to 40 of 4336 | Next » |
Anonymous
Unable to rotate
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Not meant to. Look at the stand. How can it extend enough to support a rotation? //@anonymous: Unable to rotate
2 years ago |
Anonymous
Got it last week form BB, can rotate. Just need to slant a little bit while rotating. //@anonymous: Not meant to. Look at the stand. How can it extend enough to support a rotation? //@anonymous: Unable to rotate
1 year ago |
andromeda3
It is good for gaming??
2 months ago |
Anonymous
Deal?
2 months ago |
Anonymous
No //@Anonymous: Deal?
1 week ago |