| « Previous | 2341 to 2350 of 5617 | Next » |
Anonymous
sold out
6 years ago |
Anonymous
No 5GHz wireless support.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Hot deal
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Reading ultra wide excel sheet. This is helpful. //@anonymous: Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
250 cd/m² is kind of underwhelming.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
You certainly underestimated the frustration with bezel. And with two monitors side-by-side, when you expand spreadsheet over to the next monitor, your eyes have to jump at least 2 bezels across. Nope. //@Anonymous: Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
For people who said two 24" are equal or better, I don't see much reason why people buy a pickup truck rather than two sedans //@Anonymous: Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Don't you realize that not many people but pick up trucks? //@anonymous: For people who said two 24" are equal or better, I don't see much reason why people buy a pickup truck rather than two sedans //@Anonymous: Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Both sedans won’t stall at the same time. Good luck with the truck! //@anonymous: For people who said two 24" are equal or better, I don't see much reason why people buy a pickup truck rather than two sedans //@Anonymous: Two regular 24" FHD monitors are still better from all aspects than this one. More horizontal pixels ( 2 x 1920 = 3840), the same number of vertical pixels (1080) and price could be less than $100 per monitor. I don't see much reasons to buy this one.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
What is the resolution ?
6 years ago |
Anonymous
1440p //@anonymous: What is the resolution ?
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Less choclate and icecream in 2021 is mine. Ho about your resolution? //@anonymous: What is the resolution ?
6 years ago |
Anonymous
5% off deal? What is the h...?
6 years ago |
Anonymous
OD has it at a lower price $230
https://www.officedepot.com/a/products/6838505/Lenovo-C32q-20-315-QHD-WLED/
6 years ago |
Anonymous
Not the same model. This one is curved? //@Anonymous: OD has it at a lower price $230
https://www.officedepot.com/a/products/6838505/Lenovo-C32q-20-315-QHD-WLED/
6 years ago |
Anonymous
2560 x 1440
6 years ago |
Anonymous
lenovo sucks.
6 years ago |
Anonymous
VA panel much worse than IPS
6 years ago |
| « Previous | 2341 to 2350 of 5617 | Next » |
Anonymous
Showing 449 at both links
6 years ago |
cheetah
Expired //@anonymous: Showing 449 at both links
6 years ago |