Anonymous

I ordered one back in March when we started to work from home, it just arrived this week!
One feature I like the most is that it can do background noise cancelling.

5 years ago Up 16 | Reply

Anonymous

For those who cares about video and sound quality, even this age old C270 is far better that those built-ins in top MacBook or Thinkpad. However, spend a little more and buy a newer version like C920 or C930.

6 years ago Up 11 | Reply

Anonymous

Works great for kids' online learning if you add an external monitor + keyboard to their chromebook.

5 years ago Up 10 | Reply

Anonymous

I bought it last week at walmart, $25.99

6 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

why u need it? all laptops come with a cam //@Anonymous: I bought it last week at walmart, $25.99

6 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Micro phone. //@anonymous: I bought it last week at walmart, $25.99

6 years ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

6 years ago Up 7 | Reply

Anonymous

720 p only. better buy a wyze cam at 1080p

6 years ago Up 6 | Reply

Anonymous

Logitech selling webcams like it's 1999

6 years ago Up 6 | Reply

Anonymous

Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

6 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

MacBook WebCam has very good quality. //@Anonymous: Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

6 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

you can plug off easily. //@Anonymous: MacBook WebCam has very good quality. //@Anonymous: Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

6 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

For those who cares about video and sound quality, even this age old C270 is far better that those built-ins in top MacBook or Thinkpad. However, spend a little more and buy a newer version like C920 or C930.

6 years ago Up 11 | Reply

Anonymous

But build in are convenient. //@anonymous: For those who cares about video and sound quality, even this age old C270 is far better that those built-ins in top MacBook or Thinkpad. However, spend a little more and buy a newer version like C920 or C930.

6 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

I ordered one back in March when we started to work from home, it just arrived this week!
One feature I like the most is that it can do background noise cancelling.

5 years ago Up 16 | Reply

RoshDrozzley

Do you never use desktops for a bit more processing power and a large screen? Hard to beat large dual monitors with a nice graphics card etc. //@anonymous: why u need it? all laptops come with a cam //@Anonymous: I bought it last week at walmart, $25.99

5 years ago Up 5 | Reply

Anonymous

Works great for kids' online learning if you add an external monitor + keyboard to their chromebook.

5 years ago Up 10 | Reply

Anonymous

I bought it 10 years ago for about $15 ... Still using it now and working fine.

5 years ago Up 7 | Reply

Anonymous

Oh not...MacBooks we know for their terrible 720p webcams. Are you stuck in 2010? //@anonymous: MacBook WebCam has very good quality. //@Anonymous: Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

5 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Before the pandemic I used to see these at thrift shops for a couple bucks. I have one I bought new literally 10 years ago. I can't believe they're still making these.

5 years ago Up 9 | Reply

Anonymous

It doesn't make much difference if you are using in a small window. Try to zoom into the full screen in low light, you will see how this age-old webcam beats Macbook's built-in webcam. //@Anonymous: Oh not...MacBooks we know for their terrible 720p webcams. Are you stuck in 2010? //@anonymous: MacBook WebCam has very good quality. //@Anonymous: Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

5 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Interesting. Thank you. //@Anonymous: It doesn't make much difference if you are using in a small window. Try to zoom into the full screen in low light, you will see how this age-old webcam beats Macbook's built-in webcam. //@Anonymous: Oh not...MacBooks we know for their terrible 720p webcams. Are you stuck in 2010? //@anonymous: MacBook WebCam has very good quality. //@Anonymous: Not always true - the microphone array on thinkpads sounds pretty darn good. //@anonymous: A dedicated webcam has a far better camera and mic than those cheap tiny ones on the laptops

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

why would you buy a webcam for a microphone? literally just buy a microphone instead //@Anonymous: Micro phone. //@anonymous: I bought it last week at walmart, $25.99

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

nobody had webcams in 1999, zoomer //@Anonymous: Logitech selling webcams like it's 1999

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

yes, I had since 1997. //@anonymous: nobody had webcams in 1999, zoomer //@Anonymous: Logitech selling webcams like it's 1999

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

What were you doing with the webcam when you had 25k connection speed in 1997 //@anonymous: yes, I had since 1997. //@anonymous: nobody had webcams in 1999, zoomer //@Anonymous: Logitech selling webcams like it's 1999

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

14.4k //@anonymous: What were you doing with the webcam when you had 25k connection speed in 1997 //@anonymous: yes, I had since 1997. //@anonymous: nobody had webcams in 1999, zoomer //@Anonymous: Logitech selling webcams like it's 1999

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Dude! Have you ever read anything on a 27" FHD monitor? Or compare how fonts look like between 27" FHD and 27" FHD. While it doesn't make much difference for 24" between FHD and QHD because you dont really need QHD on 24", but that extra 3" space make a huge difference. Fonts should be solid and black on 27" QHD but will appear lighter and fading on 27" FHD. I don't get it, why people rant when they dont know jack?? //@anonymous: Yup. Still some people think resolution means quality (and clarity) it would appear. New screen technologies have been developed since UHD. Not even all UHD are the same so don’t quite get this comparison of FHD vs UHD. //@anonymous: Dude, no. This is good for people with bad eyesight. Fonts are large and in charge. I'm not saying it doesn't look ridiculous, but it has the opposite effect of what you're saying. //@Anonymous: I would take this if it’s 24” or smaller. Nobody wants a 27” monitor with FHD. You can soon lose your eyesight for reading blurry fonts on a big screen (27”+) that is QHD or higher.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Guys, there is a reason why FHD 27" are so cheap compare to FHD 23 or 24". While FHD 23-24" is acceptable but FHD 27" is horrific. Only novice users would buy FHD 27". Please goto Best Buy and bring up Wikipedia on a Web Browser and see the difference between FHD 23/24", FHD 27", and QHD 27". For the 13 y/o who doesn’t read, please go post your comment on TikTok because you are not contributing here.

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

1/5 PRICE == 1/5 QUALITY

2 weeks ago Up 0 | Reply