Anonymous

Great price! Only missing feature is duplex printing

6 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

The toner for it is $75, lol

3 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

the price is 149 now.

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Use generic toner vs OEMs. YOu will save a bunch. //@Anonymous: The toner for it is $75, lol

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

I just ordered two generic toners for $20. They work great. Bought this printer three years ago at a cheaper price. No problem at all.

3 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

Is this one refurbished or brand new?

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Very old printer, but does it job. No duplex. Okay for the price. Many stores have accumulated a lot of inventories in order to hype the price. They have to sell hard next year.

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

dealdo

Bought it almost 8 years ago about $20 from staples. Believe it or not it's still working with the ancient original toner cartridge!

1 year ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Works with Linux? Particularly Arch Linux, which I use BTW.

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

toner is only 1600 pages, so you print less than 10 pages per year? //@dealdo: Bought it almost 8 years ago about $20 from staples. Believe it or not it's still working with the ancient original toner cartridge!

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

You can buy toner at ebay //@anonymous: The toner for it is $75, lol

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

very good deal. it is print-copy-scan mini all-in-1. Two things need to know before purchase: 1. no feeder for scan, 2. No internal paper holder. Beyond that it is a great for home office use.

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

I would have pointed out that it is monochrome and it is not a network printer (USB only) since I ended up checking to why this wouldn’t have a paper holder (it does and it’s 150 page max). //@anonymous: very good deal. it is print-copy-scan mini all-in-1. Two things need to know before purchase: 1. no feeder for scan, 2. No internal paper holder. Beyond that it is a great for home office use.

1 year ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Similar one was $99 in Walmart a few months ago

2 years ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

That one does not have the top feeder. I have it. Not sure its worth another 100 unless your business does a lot of copying //@anonymous: Similar one was $99 in Walmart a few months ago

2 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Na not months but like a whole year ago. I bought it. Totally worth it //@anonymous: That one does not have the top feeder. I have it. Not sure its worth another 100 unless your business does a lot of copying //@anonymous: Similar one was $99 in Walmart a few months ago

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

How is the scanner and the document feeder? Need to scan large batches of docs.

2 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Bought it last year $99

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Its pretty goood, best bang for the buck! //@anonymous: How is the scanner and the document feeder? Need to scan large batches of docs.

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply

cobra9244

No wireless in 2022……

1 year ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

who need to print their photos these days?

11 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

Why not? //@anonymous: who need to print their photos these days?

2 months ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

This is a monochrome laser printer. Why are we talking about photos?

2 months ago Up 2 | Reply

jj0915

After two decades of laser printers, I will be switching to these inkjets once the laser toners run out. Laser cartridges are cheaper but are not environmentally friendly. Life should be in color :)

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

While inkjet printers produce up to 85 percent less carbon dioxide than those of comparable laser printers, the inkjet cartridge is the issue. Usually, inkjet printers run out of ink more frequently than laser printer and thus create more cartridge waste than laser printers. There is no such thing as a free lunch. //@jj0915: After two decades of laser printers, I will be switching to these inkjets once the laser toners run out. Laser cartridges are cheaper but are not environmentally friendly. Life should be in color :)

1 year ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Yes avoid cartridges at all cost - pun intended :) These tank style inkjets don't use cartridges though and that's what I am getting... //@Anonymous:
While inkjet printers produce up to 85 percent less carbon dioxide than those of comparable laser printers, the inkjet cartridge is the issue. Usually, inkjet printers run out of ink more frequently than laser printer and thus create more cartridge waste than laser printers. There is no such thing as a free lunch. //@jj0915: After two decades of laser printers, I will be switching to these inkjets once the laser toners run out. Laser cartridges are cheaper but are not environmentally friendly. Life should be in color :)

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply