Dealsea.com: 4k

All results for: "4k"

« Previous

11 to 20 of 4774

SAMSUNG 37" ViewFinity S7 (S70D) 4K Monitor

$279.99

(Expired) SAMSUNG 37" ViewFinity S7 (S70D) 4K Monitor.

Amazon $399.99

›Add Comments

AOC U2790VQ 27" 4K 3840x2160 UHD Frameless Monitor

$179.99

(Expired) Amazon has AOC U2790VQ 27" 4K 3840x2160 UHD Frameless Monitor for $245.69. Shipping is free.

›Comments (12) ›Add Comments

Anonymous

$339.99??

5 years ago |

Infinity

Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??

5 years ago |

Anonymous

what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

onceternal

No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

Anonymous

you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

Anonymous

You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

Anonymous

Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

RoshDrozzley

Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago |

Anonymous

No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.

Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.

//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

4 years ago |

Anonymous

not 120hz, sad

4 years ago |

Anonymous

I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

2 years ago |

Anonymous

You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

1 year ago |