Anonymous

$339.99??

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Infinity

Amazon listing price is $240.52. Please try again. //@anonymous: $339.99??

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

onceternal

No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

You can tell. UHD downscale is sharper than QHD. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

RoshDrozzley

Yeah pc screens and especially laptop or phone screens are different than TVs. With a TV, most people will never sit closer than 6ft away so there is an upper limit to what resolution is worthwhile given the screen size. Desktop/laptop screens are a different story //@anonymous: Think about MacBook . Even mac 15/13 takes retina. Vivid display //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

5 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

No. QHD is good enough for 23 but not for 27. You can easily tell the difference.

Even 4k is hardly enough for 27, if you get use to 5K (like iMac), you can feel the big difference between 4K and 5K.

//@Anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

not 120hz, sad

4 years ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

I don't know your eyesight but I can tell. Even UHD downscaling (you pretty much have to do this for bigger text) the text is sharper then QHD //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

2 years ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

You can. You can easily see the difference when scaling to the same font size. //@anonymous: you just cannot tell the difference with human eyes //@onceternal: No. There is no “enough”. It can always be better //@anonymous: what's the point of 4K on 27"? I think QHD is good enough, no?

1 year ago Up 0 | Reply

Anonymous

This is actually a great deal

1 year ago Up 4 | Reply

Anonymous

This one is 60Hz.

1 year ago Up 3 | Reply

Anonymous

Don't trust Samsung any more. My Samsung monitor lasted 2 years. My other monitors last at least 5 years or more and were cheaper. My Samsung fridge lasted 3 years. One of the Samsung pads lasted a year, the other one longer.

1 year ago Up 9 | Reply

Anonymous

I have a 4K Samsung monitor and I have been using it for 9 years.
This is a great monitor.
You can't find a lower price for a 4K monitor.

1 year ago Up 1 | Reply

Anonymous

4k on a 27-inch monitor doesn’t produce adequate scales.

1 year ago Up 2 | Reply

Anonymous

32-inch 4k either. You'll have to use 150% scaling.

A 42-inch looks the best with 100% scaling. //@anonymous: 4k on a 27-inch monitor doesn’t produce adequate scales.

5 months ago Up 0 | Reply